ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2016
Utility of Washington Early Recognition Center Self-Report Screening Questionnaires in the Assessment of Patients with Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional brain connectivity in clinical high-risk youth from the Kenya psychosis-risk outcomes study (KePROS): functional network comparative area and topography analysis (FUNCATA).NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- AI-Facilitated Cognitive Reappraisal via Socrates 2.0: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- Size and Topography of the Brain's Functional Networks with Psychotic Experiences, Schizophrenia, and Bipolar Disorder.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Article
- Kenya Psychosis-Risk Outcomes Study (KePROS): Development of an Accelerated Medicine Partnership Schizophrenia-Aligned Project in Africa.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2024Article
- Tract-based analyses of white matter in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, aging, and dementia using high spatial and directional resolution diffusion imaging: a pilot study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- DSM-5 conduct disorder and symptoms in youths at high risk of psychosis in Kenya with DSM-5 mental disorders and substance use: towards integrated management.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Students stress patterns in a Kenyan socio-cultural and economic context: toward a public health intervention.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Socio-demographic, economic and mental health problems were risk factors for suicidal ideation among Kenyan students aged 15 plus.Journal of affective disorders · 2022Article
- Longitudinal and cross-sectional validation of the WERCAP screen for assessing psychosis risk and conversion.Schizophrenia research · 2022Article
- A population-based survey of autistic traits in Kenyan adolescents and young adults.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2022Article
- Comparison of Hypomanic Symptoms Between Bipolar I and Bipolar II Disorders: A Network Perspective.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Neurocognition in Kenyan youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2021Article
- Personality Traits as Markers of Psychosis Risk in Kenya: Assessment of Temperament and Character.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2020Article
- Regional cortical thinning in young adults with schizophrenia but not psychotic or non-psychotic bipolar I disorder.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification and treatment are associated with improved outcomes in bipolar disorder (BPD) and schizophrenia (SCZ). Screening for the presence of these disorders usually involves time-intensive interviews that may not be practical in settings where mental health providers are limited. Thus, individuals at earlier stages of illness are often not identified. The Washington Early Recognition Center Affectivity and Psychosis (WERCAP) screen is a self-report questionnaire originally developed to identify clinical risk for developing bipolar or psychotic disorders. The goal of the current study was to investigate the utility of the WERCAP Screen and two complementary questionnaires, the WERC Stress Screen and the WERC Substance Screen, in identifying individuals with established SCZ or BPD. Participants consisted of 35 BPD and 34 SCZ patients, as well as 32 controls (CON), aged 18-30 years. Univariate analyses were used to test for score differences between groups. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify diagnostic predictors. Significant group differences were found for the psychosis section of the WERCAP (pWERCAP; p < 0.001), affective section of the WERCAP (aWERCAP; p = 0.001), and stress severity (p = 0.027). No significant group differences were found in the rates of substance use as measured by the WERC Substance Screen (p = 0.267). Only the aWERCAP and pWERCAP scores were useful predictors of diagnostic category. ROC curve analysis showed the optimal cut point on the aWERCAP to identify BPD among our participant groups was a score of >20 [area under the curve (AUC): 0.87; sensitivity: 0.91; specificity: 0.71], while that for the pWERCAP to identify SCZ was a score of >13 (AUC: 0.89; sensitivity: 0.88; specificity: 0.82). These results indicate that the WERCAP Screen may be useful in screening individuals for BPD and SCZ and that identifying stress and substance-use severity can be rapidly done using self-report questionnaires. Larger studies in undiagnosed individuals will be needed to test the WERCAP Screen's ability to identify mania or psychosis in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.