Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27616701›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

Assessing electronic health record phenotypes against gold-standard diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus.

Susan E Spratt, Katherine Pereira, Bradi B Granger, Bryan C Batch, Matthew Phelan, Michael Pencina, Marie Lynn Miranda, Ebony Boulware, Joseph E Lucas, Charlotte L Nelson and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Performance of risk models to predict mortality risk for patients with heart failure: evaluation in an integrated health system.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Automated Type 2 Diabetes Case and Control Identification from the MIMIC-IV Database.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  17. Association between Gentrification and Health and Healthcare Utilization.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Susan E SprattDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Katherine PereiraDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Bradi B GrangerDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Bryan C BatchDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthew PhelanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael PencinaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Marie Lynn MirandaRice University and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ebony BoulwareDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Joseph E LucasDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Charlotte L NelsonDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Benjamin NeelyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Benjamin A GoldsteinDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Pamela BarthDuke Translational Medicine Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Rachel L RichessonDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Isaretta L RileyDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Leonor CorsinoDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Eugenia R McPeek HinzDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Shelley RusincovitchDuke Translational Medicine Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer GreenDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Anna Beth BartonDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
DDC Phenotype Group
Carly Kelley
Kristen Hyland
Monica Tang
Amanda Elliott
Ewa Ruel
Alexander Clark
Melanie Mabrey
Kay Lyn Morrissey
Jyothi Rao
Beatrice Hong
Marjorie Pierre-Louis
Katherine Kelly
Nicole Jelesoff

Funding

Understanding and predicting cardiac events in HD using real-time EHRsK25DK097279 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDSTEIN, BENJAMIN ALAN · 2013 to 2017
$797k
NIDDK NIH HHS K25 DK097279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe assessed the sensitivity and specificity of 8 electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotypes for diabetes mellitus against gold-standard American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria via chart review by clinical experts. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified EHR-based diabetes phenotype definitions that were developed for various purposes by a variety of users, including academic medical centers, Medicare, the New York City Health Department, and pharmacy benefit managers. We applied these definitions to a sample of 173 503 patients with records in the Duke Health System Enterprise Data Warehouse and at least 1 visit over a 5-year period (2007-2011). Of these patients, 22 679 (13%) met the criteria of 1 or more of the selected diabetes phenotype definitions. A statistically balanced sample of these patients was selected for chart review by clinical experts to determine the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes in the sample.

resultsThe sensitivity (62-94%) and specificity (95-99%) of EHR-based type 2 diabetes phenotypes (compared with the gold standard ADA criteria via chart review) varied depending on the component criteria and timing of observations and measurements. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsResearchers using EHR-based phenotype definitions should clearly specify the characteristics that comprise the definition, variations of ADA criteria, and how different phenotype definitions and components impact the patient populations retrieved and the intended application. Careful attention to phenotype definitions is critical if the promise of leveraging EHR data to improve individual and population health is to be fulfilled.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAlgorithmsDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinHumansPhenotypeSensitivity and SpecificityGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humandiabetes identificationdiabetes registriesEHR phenotypes

Identifiers

PMID27616701
PMCPMC6080723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.