ArticleBone2016
Assessing the general population frequency of rare coding variants in the EXT1 and EXT2 genes previously implicated in hereditary multiple exostoses.
Article in Bone, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mutation spectrum of EXT1 and EXT2 in the Saudi patients with hereditary multiple exostoses.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Hereditary multiple osteochondromas in Jordanian patients: Mutational and immunohistochemical analysis ofOncology letters · 2021Article
- Hereditary Multiple Exostoses: Current Insights.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2019Review
- A de novo mutation in the EXT2 gene associated with osteochondromatosis in a litter of American Staffordshire Terriers.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018Article
- The prevalence of DICER1 pathogenic variation in population databases.International journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Hereditary Multiple Exostoses: New Insights into Pathogenesis, Clinical Complications, and Potential Treatments.Current osteoporosis reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) is a rare childhood-onset skeletal disease linked to mutations in exostosin glycosyltransferase 1 (EXT1) or 2 (EXT2). Patients are heterozygous for either an EXT1 or EXT2 mutation, and it is widely assumed that exostosis formation and associated defects, such as growth retardation and skeletal deformities, require loss-of-heterozygosity or a second hit in affected cells. However, the relevance and phenotypic impact of many presumed pathogenic EXT variants remain uncertain. We extracted all amino acid-altering (missense) and loss of function (LoF; nonsense, frameshift, or splice-site) variants from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), a large population-based repository of exome sequence data from diverse ancestries that has screened out severe pediatric disease, to assess the overall mutation spectrum of predicted protein-damaging variants across these two genes in the general population. We then determined whether clinically-identified, presumably pathogenic variants implicated in HME exist among healthy individuals. We found six EXT1 and four EXT2 missense mutations in ExAC, suggesting that these mutations have either been misclassified as pathogenic or are not fully penetrant. Furthermore, EXT1 is heavily selectively constrained, while EXT2 is more tolerant to protein-damaging variants, especially at its C-terminus, possibly explaining the genotype-phenotype correlation that EXT1 variants usually result in more severe disease. In conclusion, population-based exome data is a useful filter for determining whether clinically detected variants are likely pathogenic, as well as revealing biological insight into rare disease genes such as EXT1 and EXT2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.