Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27615420›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2016

Social networks and neurological illness.

Amar Dhand, Douglas A Luke, Catherine E Lang, Jin-Moo Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amar DhandDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street and at the Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, 177 Huntington Avenue, 11th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Douglas A LukeCenter for Public Health Systems Science, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus BOX 1196, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Catherine E LangProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8502, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, Suite 1101, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Jin-Moo LeeDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8111, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

Funding

Genetic Architecture of Acute Human Brain IschemiaR01NS085419 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CRUCHAGA, CARLOS, LEE, JIN-MOO · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
INFLUENCE OF INTERHEMISPHERIC CONNECTIVITY ON RECOVERY AFTER FOCAL ISCHEMIAR01NS084028 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, JIN-MOO · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
Impact of Social Network Structure on Stroke RecoveryK23HD083489 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DHAND, AMAR · 2015 to 2020
$750k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD083489NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084028NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every patient is embedded in a social network of interpersonal connections that influence health outcomes. Neurologists routinely need to engage with a patient's family and friends due to the nature of the illness and its social sequelae. Social isolation is a potent determinant of poor health and neurobiological changes, and its effects can be comparable to those of traditional risk factors. It would seem reasonable, therefore, to map and follow the personal networks of neurology patients. This approach reveals influential people, their habits, and linkage patterns that could facilitate or limit health behaviours. Personal network information can be particularly valuable to enhance risk factor management, medication adherence, and functional recovery. Here, we propose an agenda for research and clinical practice that includes mapping the networks of patients with diverse neurological disorders, evaluating the impact of the networks on patient outcomes, and testing network interventions.

Indexed as

Social SupportFamilyHumansNervous System Diseases

Identifiers

PMID27615420
PMCPMC5056369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.