Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27615365›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Effect of X-ray irradiation on ancient DNA in sub-fossil bones - Guidelines for safe X-ray imaging.

Alexander Immel, Adeline Le Cabec, Marion Bonazzi, Alexander Herbig, Heiko Temming, Verena J Schuenemann, Kirsten I Bos, Frauke Langbein, Katerina Harvati, Anne Bridault and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reduced Dietary Protein Induces Changes in the Dental Proteome.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Volume electron microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Microstratigraphic preservation of ancient faunal and hominin DNA in Pleistocene cave sediments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cardiac multi-scale investigation of the right and left ventricleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
    Review
  15. Ancient dental pulp: Masterpiece tissue for paleomicrobiology.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexander ImmelDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Adeline Le CabecDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Marion BonazziInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Alexander HerbigDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Heiko TemmingDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Verena J SchuenemannInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Kirsten I BosDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Frauke LangbeinInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Katerina HarvatiSenckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Palaeoecology, Palaeoanthropology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anne BridaultCNRS UMR 7041 ArScAn, Equipe Archéologies environnementales, F-92023 Nanterre Cedex, France.
Gilbert PionAssociation départementale pour la recherche archéologique en Savoie, F-73230 Saint-Alban-Leysse, France.
Marie-Anne JulienCentre for the Archaeology of Human Origins, Archaeology Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Oleksandra KrotovaDepartment of Stone Age, Institute of Archaeology, National Ukrainian Academy of Science, Kiev, Ukraine.
Nicholas J ConardSenckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Susanne C MünzelInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeozoology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Dorothée G DruckerDepartment of Geosciences, Palaeobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bence ViolaDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Jean-Jacques HublinDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Paul TafforeauEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Johannes KrauseDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility · FRMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DESenckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment · DEArchéologies et Sciences de l’Antiquité · FRKiel University · DEUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-fossilised remains may still contain highly degraded ancient DNA (aDNA) useful for palaeogenetic investigations. Whether X-ray computed [micro-] tomography ([μ]CT) imaging of these fossils may further damage aDNA remains debated. Although the effect of X-ray on DNA in living organisms is well documented, its impact on aDNA molecules is unexplored. Here we investigate the effects of synchrotron X-ray irradiation on aDNA from Pleistocene bones. A clear correlation appears between decreasing aDNA quantities and accumulating X-ray dose-levels above 2000 Gray (Gy). We further find that strong X-ray irradiation reduces the amount of nucleotide misincorporations at the aDNA molecule ends. No representative effect can be detected for doses below 200 Gy. Dosimetry shows that conventional μCT usually does not reach the risky dose level, while classical synchrotron imaging can degrade aDNA significantly. Optimised synchrotron protocols and simple rules introduced here are sufficient to ensure that fossils can be scanned without impairing future aDNA studies.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientAnimalsBone and BonesDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFossilsSynchrotronsX-RaysDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID27615365
PMCPMC5018823
OpenAlexW2416269919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.