Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27614869›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Patient- and family-centered care: a qualitative exploration of oncologist perspectives.

Timothy K Nguyen, Glenn S Bauman, Christopher J Watling, Karin Hahn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dealing with death in cancer care: should the oncologist be an amicus mortis?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  6. Acute impact of home parenteral nutrition in patients with late-stage cancer on family caregivers: preliminary data.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  7. Family-Centered Care in asthma treatment for patients under 5 years of age.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy K NguyenDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Glenn S BaumanDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada. glenn.bauman@lhsc.on.ca.
Christopher J WatlingDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Karin HahnDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
London Health Sciences Centre · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreasingly, patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) is recognized as a valuable component of healthcare reform with rich opportunities for improvement within oncology. Shifting toward PFCC requires physician buy-in; however, research examining their perspectives on PFCC is lacking. We sought to explore oncologists' perspectives on PFCC to identify factors that influence their ability to practice PFCC.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 oncologists (8 radiation, 4 medical, 4 surgical, 2 hematologist-oncologists) at a single Canadian academic cancer institution. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis and principles drawn from grounded theory. Subsequently, focus groups consisting of the interviewed participants were facilitated to confirm and elaborate on our findings. Constant comparisons were used to identify recurring themes.

resultsThree dominant themes emerged. First, physicians displayed cautious engagement in their approach to PFCC. Collectively, participants understood the general principles of PFCC. However, there was a limited understanding of the value, implications, and motivation for improving PFCC which may create reluctance with physician buy-in. Second, both individual and system barriers to practicing PFCC were identified. A lack of physician acknowledgement and engagement and competing responsibilities emerged as provider-level challenges. System barriers included impaired clinic workflow, physical infrastructure constraints, and delays in access to care. Third, physicians were able to identify existing and potential PFCC behaviors that were feasible within existing system constraints.

conclusionsAdvancing PFCC will require continued physician education regarding the value of PFCC, acknowledgement and preservation of effective patient- and family-centered strategies, and creative solutions to address the system constraints to delivering PFCC.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient-Centered CareAdultCanadaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOncologistsQualitative ResearchWorkflowBarriersPatient- and family-centered carePatient-centered carePhysicianStrategies

Identifiers

PMID27614869
OpenAlexW2517767690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.