Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27614762›Full record

SynthesisHealth and quality of life outcomes2016

Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Caroline Martini, Eva-Maria Gamper, Lisa Wintner, Bernhard Nilica, Barbara Sperner-Unterweger, Bernhard Holzner, Irene Virgolini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Knowledge translation concerns for the CONSORT-PRO extension reporting guidance: a review of reviews.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sex differences in carcinoid syndrome: A gap to be closed.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Quality of life in patients with midgut NET following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Perceptions of care and patient-reported outcomes in people living with neuroendocrine tumours.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline MartiniDepartment for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Eva-Maria GamperDepartment for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. eva.gamper@tirol-kliniken.at.
Lisa WintnerDepartment for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard NilicaDepartment for Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Barbara Sperner-UnterwegerDepartment for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard HolznerDepartment for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Irene VirgoliniDepartment for Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) are often slow-growing and patients may live for years with metastasised disease. Hence, along with increasing overall and progression-free survival, treatments aim at preserving patients' well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, studies on systematic HRQoL assessment in patients with GEP-NET are scarce. Therefore, the purpose of the current review is to systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the identified studies.

methodsA targeted database search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Data extraction was conducted by two independent researchers according to predefined criteria. For study evaluation, the Minimum Standard Checklist for Evaluating HRQoL Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials and the CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome extension were adapted.

resultsThe database search yielded 48 eligible studies. We found the awareness for the need of HRQoL measurement to be growing and application of cancer-specific instruments gaining acceptance. Overall, studies were too heterogeneous in terms of patient characteristics and treatment interventions to draw clear conclusions for clinical practice. More importantly, a range of methodological shortcomings has been identified which were mainly related to the assessment and statistical analysis, as well as the reporting and interpretation of HRQoL data.

conclusionDespite an increasing interest in HRQoL in GEP-NET patients, there is still a lack of knowledge on this issue. A transfer of HRQoL results into clinical practice is hindered not only by the scarceness of studies, but also by the often limited quality of HRQoL processing and reporting.

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalHealth StatusHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePancreatic NeoplasmsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeStomach NeoplasmsGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumoursHealth-related quality of lifeMethodological qualityPatient-reported outcomesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27614762
PMCPMC5018190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.