Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27614759›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2017

Intravesical treatment for interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome: a network meta-analysis.

Wei Zhang, Xiaojing Deng, Chunyu Liu, Xu Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. An update on treatment options for interstitial cystitis.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Potential of Endocannabinoids to Control Bladder Pain.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei ZhangTianjin Institute of Urology, The 2nd Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojing DengTianjin Institute of Urology, The 2nd Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
Chunyu LiuTianjin Institute of Urology, The 2nd Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
Xu WangTianjin Institute of Urology, The 2nd Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Medical University, 23 Pingjiang Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China. xuwang2003@sina.com.
Tianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisInterstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the submucosal and muscular layers of the bladder. So far, there is no effective and targeted treatment strategy for IC/PBS. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravesical instillation treatment in IC/PBS patients.

methodsWe searched various databases up to October 2015. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare global response assessment (GRA) for different treatment strategies, including botulinum toxin A (BoNTA), bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), resiniferatoxin (RTX), lidocaine, chondroitin sulfate (CS), oxybutynin, and pentosan polysulfate (PPS). A traditional meta-analysis was also performed.

resultsSixteen trials evaluating 905 patients were included. Network meta-analysis indicated that BoNTA had the highest probability of being the best treatment course according to GRA assessment results (probability 81.7 %). BCG or BoNTA therapy yielded significant improvement in GRA incidence according to traditional meta-analysis. Patients who received PPS showed higher urinary frequency results compared with the placebo groups. BCG- and PPS-treated patients had elevated urinary urgency treatment effects compared with placebo groups. Bladder capacity restoration results also showed significant improvements in patients who received BoNTA compared with placebo-treated individuals.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that BoNTA therapy has the highest probability of being the best therapy according to GRA, and significantly improves bladder capacity in IC/PBS patients. BCG treatment also significantly increases the incidence of GRA and improves the symptoms of urinary urgency. PPS can significantly improve urinary frequency and urgency symptoms in IC/PBS patients.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravesicalBCG VaccineBotulinum Toxins, Type ACystitis, InterstitialHumansNeurotoxinsBCG VaccineBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeurotoxinsClinical trialsInterstitial cystitisIntravesical treatmentMeta-analysisPainful bladder syndrome

Identifiers

PMID27614759
OpenAlexW2513097986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.