Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27614662›Full record

Trial reportJournal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry2017

Do improved patient recall and the provision of memory support enhance treatment adherence?

Lu Dong, Jason Y Lee, Allison G Harvey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lu DongUniversity of California, Berkeley, United States.
Jason Y LeeUniversity of California, Berkeley, United States.
Allison G HarveyUniversity of California, Berkeley, United States. Electronic address: aharvey@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Improving Depression Outcome by Enhancing Memory for Cognitive TherapyR01MH108657 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARVEY, ALLISON G · 2016 to 2019
$3.0M
Improving Depression Outcome by Enhancing Memory for Cognitive TherapyR34MH094535 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARVEY, ALLISON G · 2012 to 2014
$813k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108657NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH094535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPatient adherence to psychosocial treatment is an important but understudied topic. The aim of this study was to examine whether better patient recall of treatment contents and therapist use of memory support (MS) were associated with better treatment adherence.

methodsData were drawn from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were 48 individuals (mean age = 44.27 years, 29 females) with Major Depressive Disorder randomized to receive either Cognitive Therapy (CT) with an adjunctive Memory Support Intervention (CT + Memory Support) or CT-as-usual. Therapist and patient ratings of treatment adherence were collected during each treatment session. Patient recall was assessed at mid-treatment. Therapist use of MS was manually coded for a random selection of sessions.

resultsPatient recall was significantly associated with better therapist and patient ratings of adherence. Therapist use of Application, a specific MS strategy, predicted higher therapist ratings of adherence. Attention Recruitment, another specific MS strategy, appeared to attenuate the positive impact of session number on patient ratings of adherence. Treatment groups, MS summary scores and other specific MS strategies were not significantly associated with adherence. LIMITATIONS: The measure for treatment adherence is in the process of being formally validated. Results were based on small sample.

conclusionsThese results support the importance of patient recall in treatment adherence. Although collectively the effects of MS on treatment adherence were not significant, the results support the use of certain specific MS strategy (i.e., application) as a potential pathway to improve treatment adherence. Larger-scale studies are needed to further examine these constructs.

Indexed as

InternetMajor Depressive DisorderAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMental RecallMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPatient CompliancePilot ProjectsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeCognitive therapyDepressionMemory supportTransdiagnosticTreatment adherenceTreatment development

Identifiers

PMID27614662
PMCPMC5558150
OpenAlexW2513355877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.