Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27614628›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2017

DNA repair mechanisms in embryonic stem cells.

Xuemei Fu, Ke Cui, Qiuxiang Yi, Lili Yu, Yang Xu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA Damage Responses, the Trump Card of Stem Cells in the Survival Game.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cleavage of Early Mouse Embryo with Damaged DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cops5 safeguards genomic stability of embryonic stem cells through regulating cellular metabolism and DNA repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuemei FuShenzhen Children's Hospital, 7019 Yitian Road, Shenzhen, 518026, China. fxmzj2004@163.com.
Ke CuiCenter for Regenerative and Translational Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qiuxiang YiCenter for Regenerative and Translational Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lili YuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy, Cancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yang XuCenter for Regenerative and Translational Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. yangxu@ucsd.edu.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNSouthern Medical University · CNShenzhen Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can undergo unlimited self-renewal and retain the pluripotency to differentiate into all cell types in the body. Therefore, as a renewable source of various functional cells in the human body, ESCs hold great promise for human cell therapy. During the rapid proliferation of ESCs in culture, DNA damage, such as DNA double-stranded breaks, will occur in ESCs. Therefore, to realize the potential of ESCs in human cell therapy, it is critical to understand the mechanisms how ESCs activate DNA damage response and DNA repair to maintain genomic stability, which is a prerequisite for their use in human therapy. In this context, it has been shown that ESCs harbor much fewer spontaneous mutations than somatic cells. Consistent with the finding that ESCs are genetically more stable than somatic cells, recent studies have indicated that ESCs can mount more robust DNA damage responses and DNA repair than somatic cells to ensure their genomic integrity.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsApoptosisCell Cycle CheckpointsCell ProliferationEmbryonic Stem CellsGenomic InstabilityHumansDNA damage responseDNA repairEmbryonic stem cellsGenetic stabilityPluripotency

Identifiers

PMID27614628
PMCPMC11107665
OpenAlexW2511351127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.