Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27614460›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2017

Methicillin resistance and biofilm production of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from infectious and normal flora conjunctiva.

Norma Fariña, Margarita Samudio, Letizia Carpinelli, Martin M Nentwich, Herminia Mino de Kaspar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Virulence Factors in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Pathogenic Mechanisms and Host Interactions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Norma FariñaInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud (IICS), Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Margarita SamudioInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud (IICS), Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay. margarita.samudio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2813-218X
Letizia CarpinelliInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud (IICS), Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Martin M NentwichDepartment of Ophthalmology, Julius-Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany.
Herminia Mino de KasparDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Universidad Nacional de Asunción · PYInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud · ARLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCoagulase-negative staphylococci have been reported to be the most frequent cause of bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis. Biofilm formation is the major virulence factor of Staphylococcus epidermidis and is often associated with methicillin resistance. This study aims at evaluating the presence of biofilm-producing and methicillin resistance genes (mecA) in S. epidermidis.

methodsS. epidermidis isolated from clinically infected sites (group 1) and from normal human conjunctiva (group 2) were studied. All the isolates were tested for their ability to produce biofilm by the conventional Christensen´s method and the presence of mecA by PCR using the 22-mer oligonucleotides as primers.

resultsIn total 20 isolates from group 1 and 22 from group 2 were studied. Biofilm and mecA were detected in 15 (75 %) and in 14 (70 %) in group 1 as compared to 8 (36.3 %) and 4 (18.2 %) in group 2 (p = 0.016). Simultaneously, biofilm production and presence of mecA genes were observed in 13/20 (65.0 %) in group 1, and 4/22 (18.2 %) in group 2 (p = 0.002). Multi-resistance was observed in 55 % in group 1 and 9 % in group 2 (p = 0.002); 57 % of the biofilm-producing strains was multi-resistant in contrast to none of the non-producing strains. In all multi-resistant strains, biofilm production was seen.

conclusionsBiofilm formation capacity was widely distributed, particularly among mecA (+) S. epidermidis strains, which also displayed a high diversity of antibiotic resistance profiles.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsConjunctivaConjunctivitisDNA, BacterialEye Infections, BacterialHumansMethicillinPolymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus epidermidisAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialMethicillinBiofilmmecA geneMultiresistenceS. epidermidis

Identifiers

PMID27614460
OpenAlexW2517115789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.