ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2016
Next-generation electron microscopy in autophagy research.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)Autophagy · 2021Guideline
- Imaging Cytoskeleton Components by Electron Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Guidelines for Regulated Cell Death Assays: A Systematic Summary, A Categorical Comparison, A Prospective.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- An improved method for high-throughput quantification of autophagy in mammalian cells.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Review
- Insights into autophagosome biogenesis from structural and biochemical analyses of the ATG2A-WIPI4 complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Tools for the cryo-EM gold rush: going from the cryo-EM map to the atomistic model.Bioscience reports · 2017Review
- Mechanisms of Autophagy Initiation.Annual review of biochemistry · 2017Review
- Autophagy and its link to type II diabetes mellitus.BioMedicine · 2017Article
- Acidic pH environment induces autophagy in osteoblasts.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autophagy is the process whereby cytosol, organelles, and inclusions are taken up in a double-membrane vesicle known as the autophagosome, and transported to the lysosome for destruction and recycling. Electron microscopy (EM) led to the discovery of autophagy in the 1950s and has been a central part of its characterization ever since. New capabilities in single particle EM studies of the autophagy machinery are beginning to provide exciting insights into the mechanisms of autophagosome initiation, growth, and substrate targeting. These include EM structures at various resolutions of part of the Atg1 protein kinase complex and all of the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate complex I that initiate autophagy; the mTORC1 complex that regulates autophagy initiation; the Ape1 particle, a major substrate for selective autophagy in yeast; and p62, a mammalian selective autophagy adaptor. Equally exciting are the prospects for increased resolution and insight into autophagosome formation in cells from advances in cryo-EM tomography and focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM). This review considers recent accomplishments, prospects for progress, and remaining obstacles that still need to be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.