Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613953›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016

Stigmatic and Sympathetic Attitudes Toward Cancer Patients Who Smoke: A Qualitative Analysis of an Online Discussion Board Forum.

Christina M Luberto, Kelly A Hyland, Joanna M Streck, Brandon Temel, Elyse R Park

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Narrative Inquiry into the Adjustment Experiences of Male Bladder Cancer Survivors with a Neobladder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Multilevel Opportunities to Address Lung Cancer Stigma across the Cancer Control Continuum.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christina M LubertoDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; cluberto@mgh.harvard.edu.
Kelly A HylandTobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Joanna M StreckVermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Brandon TemelTobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Elyse R Park
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Research Training in Complementary and Integrative MedicineT32AT000051 · NCCIH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI GLORIA Y YEH · 1999 to 2026
$10.2M
Examining Delivery of Integrated Tobacco Treatment in Cancer CareK24CA197382 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PARK, ELYSE R. · 2015 to 2019
$841k
NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT000051NCI NIH HHS K24 CA197382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA significant minority of patients continue to smoke after a cancer diagnosis. Cancer patients who smoke experience stigma that can negatively impact health outcomes. We explored publicly shared perspectives about cancer patients who continued to smoke post-diagnosis.

methodsAn online news article, published in January 2012, summarized the findings of smoking prevalence among patients with lung cancer and colorectal cancer enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium trial. In response, written comments were posted on the articles' public discussion board. Applying principles of grounded theory, we conducted a document analysis and established a conceptual framework to develop a model by which to explain factors underlying stigmatic and sympathetic attitudes toward cancer survivors who continue to smoke.

resultsPersonal experiences with cancer, smoking, and statistical literacy were found to influence beliefs about cancer and smoking, which in turn influenced stigmatic or sympathetic attitudes. More sympathetic attitudes were expressed by individuals who had personal experiences with smoking, believed cancer is multicausal, identified smoking as an addiction, or considered extrinsic factors responsible for smoking. Individuals who did not have personal experiences with cancer or smoking, had low statistical literacy, believed that smoking necessarily and directly causes cancer, and focused on intrinsic responsibilities for smoking tended to express more stigmatic attitudes.

conclusionsThe current findings raise awareness and provide insight into stigma against cancer survivors who smoke and can help inform strategies for reducing stigma against this vulnerable group. IMPLICATIONS: This study helps raise awareness of stigma toward cancer patients who smoke and provides insight into the processes that may influence stigmatic as compared to sympathetic attitudes toward these patients. Results suggest that population-based strategies to educate the public regarding the nature of nicotine addiction, difficulty of quitting, and benefits of quitting for cancer patients may be useful for reducing stigma against cancer patients with a smoking history.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial StigmaHumansInternetInterviews as TopicLung NeoplasmsSmokingSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID27613953
PMCPMC5103935
OpenAlexW2474301055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.