Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613952›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2017

The Application of a Decision-Theoretic Model to Estimate the Public Health Impact of Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation in the United States.

David T Levy, Ron Borland, Andrea C Villanti, Raymond Niaura, Zhe Yuan, Yian Zhang, Rafael Meza, Theodore R Holford, Geoffrey T Fong, K Michael Cummings and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Decision-Theoretic Public Health Framework for Heated Tobacco and Nicotine Vaping Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A cost-utility analysis of the impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems on health care costs and outcomes in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Applying the Population Health Standard to the Regulation of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Review
  17. US Nicotine Vaping ProductInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David T LevyDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Ron BorlandVicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrea C VillantiSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington DC.
Raymond NiauraSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington DC.
Zhe YuanDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Yian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Theodore R HolfordDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
David B AbramsDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Eric P. Winer · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention and Control PoliciesU01CA199284 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2015 to 2019
$8.4M
MODELING THE POLICY IMPACT OF CIGARETTE AND SMOKELESS USE ON US MORTALITYR01DA036497 · NIDA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, DAVID THEODORE · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199284NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe public health impact of vaporized nicotine products (VNPs) such as e-cigarettes is unknown at this time. VNP uptake may encourage or deflect progression to cigarette smoking in those who would not have otherwise smoked, thereby undermining or accelerating reductions in smoking prevalence seen in recent years.

methodsThe public health impact of VNP use are modeled in terms of how it alters smoking patterns among those who would have otherwise smoked cigarettes and among those who would not have otherwise smoked cigarettes in the absence of VNPs. The model incorporates transitions from trial to established VNP use, transitions to exclusive VNP and dual use, and the effects of cessation at later ages. Public health impact on deaths and life years lost is estimated for a recent birth cohort incorporating evidence-informed parameter estimates.

resultsBased on current use patterns and conservative assumptions, we project a reduction of 21% in smoking-attributable deaths and of 20% in life years lost as a result of VNP use by the 1997 US birth cohort compared to a scenario without VNPs. In sensitivity analysis, health gains from VNP use are especially sensitive to VNP risks and VNP use rates among those likely to smoke cigarettes.

conclusionsUnder most plausible scenarios, VNP use generally has a positive public health impact. However, very high VNP use rates could result in net harms. More accurate projections of VNP impacts will require better longitudinal measures of transitions into and out of VNP, cigarette and dual use. IMPLICATIONS: Previous models of VNP use do not incorporate whether youth and young adults initiating VNP would have been likely to have been a smoker in the absence of VNPs. This study provides a decision-theoretic model of VNP use in a young cohort that incorporates tendencies toward smoking and shows that, under most plausible scenarios, VNP use yields public health gains. The model makes explicit the type of surveillance information needed to better estimate the effect of new products and thereby inform public policy.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesModels, TheoreticalPublic HealthSmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision TreesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSmoking

Identifiers

PMID27613952
PMCPMC5234365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.