Problematic Assessment of the Impact of Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation in the United States.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Deliberate Choice? Exploring the Decision to Switch from Cigarettes to E-Cigarettes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
   Article
2. A Descriptive Report of Electronic Cigarette Use After Participation in a Community-Based Tobacco Cessation Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
   Observational
3. Developing Consistent and Transparent Models of E-cigarette Use: Reply to Glantz and Soneji et al.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Developing Consistent and Transparent Models of E-cigarette Use: Reply to Glantz and Soneji et al.2017
• Comment on
  The Application of a Decision-Theoretic Model to Estimate the Public Health Impact of Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation in the United States.2017

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as