Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613928›Full record

Observational studyNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016

Does Quitting Smoking Make a Difference Among Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer Patients?

Seung Hee Choi, Jeffrey E Terrell, Carol R Bradford, Tamer Ghanem, Matthew E Spector, Gregory T Wolf, Isaac M Lipkus, Sonia A Duffy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Tobacco Assessment in Actively Accruing National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Network Trials.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tobacco Cessation Following Laryngeal Cancer Diagnosis Predicts Response to Treatment and Laryngectomy-Free Survival.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Daily Assessment Study of Smoking Cessation After a Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  15. Has the National Fall in Smoking Rates in Ireland Been Replicated in Cancer Patients? A 5-Year Report.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The characteristics of patients who quit smoking in the year following a cancer diagnosis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Hee ChoiCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Jeffrey E TerrellUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Carol R BradfordUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Tamer GhanemHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Matthew E SpectorUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Gregory T WolfUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Isaac M LipkusSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Sonia A DuffyCollege of Nursing, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; duffy.278@osu.edu.
Michigan Medicine · USDuke University · USHenry Ford Hospital · USMichigan State University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Therapeutic Potential and Mechanism of Action of Potent Small Molecule InhibitorsP50CA097248 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NOR, JACQUES EDUARDO · 2002 to 2013
$25.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo determine if smoking after a cancer diagnosis makes a difference in mortality among newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients.

methodsLongitudinal data were collected from newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients with a median follow-up time of 1627 days (N = 590). Mortality was censored at 8 years or September 1, 2011, whichever came first. Based on smoking status, all patients were categorized into four groups: continuing smokers, quitters, former smokers, or never-smokers. A broad range of covariates were included in the analyses. Kaplan-Meier curves, bivariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed.

resultsEight-year overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality were 40.5% (239/590) and 25.4% (150/590), respectively. Smoking status after a cancer diagnosis predicted overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality. Compared to never-smokers, continuing smokers had the highest hazard ratio (HR) of dying from all causes (HR = 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.48-4.98). Those who smoked at diagnosis, but quit and did not relapse-quitters-had an improved hazard ratio of dying (HR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.29-4.36) and former smokers at diagnosis with no relapse after diagnosis-former smokers-had the lowest hazard ratio of dying from all causes (HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.12-2.56). Similarly, quitters had a slightly higher hazard ratio of dying from cancer-specific reasons (HR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.13-5.01) than never-smokers, which was similar to current smokers (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.96-4.47), followed by former smokers (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.00-2.89).

conclusionsCompared to never-smokers, continuing smokers have the highest HR of overall mortality followed by quitters and former smokers, which indicates that smoking cessation, even after a cancer diagnosis, may improve overall mortality among newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients. Health care providers should consider incorporating smoking cessation interventions into standard cancer treatment to improve survival among this population. IMPLICATIONS: Using prospective observational longitudinal data from 590 head and neck cancer patients, this study showed that continuing smokers have the highest overall mortality relative to never-smokers, which indicates that smoking cessation, even after a cancer diagnosis, may have beneficial effects on long-term overall mortality. Health care providers should consider incorporating smoking cessation interventions into standard cancer treatment to improve survival among this population.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMichiganMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesSmoking

Identifiers

PMID27613928
PMCPMC5103939
OpenAlexW2514833172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.