Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613880›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2017

A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial of Electronic Cigarette Sampling Among Smokers.

Ellen Meier, Amy E Wahlquist, Bryan W Heckman, K Michael Cummings, Brett Froeliger, Matthew J Carpenter

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Standardized research electronic cigarette acceptability among adult men and women who smoke combustible cigarettes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Trial
  11. Biomarkers of Exposure Among "Dual Users" of Tobacco Cigarettes and Electronic Cigarettes in Canada.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Trial
  12. A Naturalistic, Randomized Pilot Trial of E-Cigarettes: Uptake, Exposure, and Behavioral Effects.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Multiple Tobacco Product Use and the Impact of Regulatory Action.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Review
  17. Does Electronic Cigarette Use Predict Abstinence from Conventional Cigarettes among Smokers in Hong Kong?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen MeierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; meier109@umn.edu.
Amy E WahlquistDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC.
Bryan W HeckmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, Charleston, SC.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC.
Brett FroeligerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, Charleston, SC.
Matthew J CarpenterDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC.
MUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Charleston · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI John J Lemasters · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
Clinical Scientists Training Program in Addictions at MUSCK12DA031794 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Kevin M. Gray, AIMEE L MCRAE-CLARK · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA031794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic cigarette (EC) use is proliferating, but initial uptake patterns and their influence on smoking remains unclear. This study of EC sampling examines naturalistic uptake of ECs, as well as effects on smoking and perceived reward from smoking and vaping.

methodsWithin a double-blind randomized crossover design, smokers (n = 24; 75% male; M

resultsNo significant differences emerged between active and placebo EC weeks in vaping or regular smoking, EC reinforcement, and intention/confidence to quit smoking. Satisfaction from smoking (p = .04) and smoking's ability to reduce cravings (p = .003) decreased from the naturalistic to active EC week. Behavioral dependence to cigarettes decreased from the naturalistic (M = 16.5, p = .02) to active (M = 14.7) and placebo (M = 14.2) EC weeks.

conclusionsFew differences emerged in vaping, regular cigarette use, and overall reactions to ECs between active and placebo ECs. Active ECs appeared to decrease reinforcement from smoking, and both active and placebo ECs reduced behavioral dependence to cigarettes. Nicotine (per labeling) may have minimal influence on the uptake of first generation ECs among smokers. IMPLICATIONS: First generation ECs provide an important behavioral/sensorimotor replacement for cigarettes, regardless of nicotine delivery, but substantial substitution may be minimal when smokers are only asked to use ad libitum. However, newer models of EC devices that provide better nicotine delivery should be examined for potential differential patterns of smoking and vaping (eg, decreased smoking and increased vaping) given their suggested greater ability to provide nicotine and behavior/sensorimotor replacement.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsPatient SatisfactionSmoking PreventionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSmoking CessationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27613880
PMCPMC5234361
OpenAlexW2507174912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.