SynthesisAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2017
International patient and physician consensus on a psoriatic arthritis core outcome set for clinical trials.
Synthesis in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03620188 (Are we Meeting Patient Treatment Goals With Guideline-based Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 114 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Are we Meeting Patient Treatment Goals With Guideline-based Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 269 citations in OpenAlex.
- EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2023 update.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of IL-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Immunologic research · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Appraisal of Candidate Instruments for Assessment of the Physical Function Domain in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.The Journal of rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Guideline
- Time until onset of action when treating psoriatic arthritis: meta-analysis and novel approach of generating confidence intervals.Rheumatology international · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Durable control of psoriatic arthritis with guselkumab across domains and patient characteristics: post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Trial
- Regular Exercise Improved Fatigue and Musculoskeletal Pain in Young Adult Psoriatic Patients without Psoriatic Arthritis.Nutrients · 2023Trial
- Effect of bimekizumab on symptoms and impact of disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis over 3 years: results from BE ACTIVE.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2022Trial
- Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, 52-week phase IIb study.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2021Trial
- Effect of filgotinib on health-related quality of life in active psoriatic arthritis: a randomized phase 2 trial (EQUATOR).Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Fatigue numeric rating scale validity, discrimination and responder definition in patients with psoriatic arthritis.RMD open · 2020Trial
- Secukinumab efficacy on resolution of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies.Arthritis research & therapy · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Disease-specific composite measures for psoriatic arthritis are highly responsive to a Janus kinase inhibitor treatment that targets multiple domains of disease.Arthritis research & therapy · 2018Trial
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify a core set of domains (outcomes) to be measured in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) clinical trials that represent both patients' and physicians' priorities.
methodsWe conducted (1) a systematic literature review (SLR) of domains assessed in PsA; (2) international focus groups to identify domains important to people with PsA; (3) two international surveys with patients and physicians to prioritise domains; (4) an international face-to-face meeting with patients and physicians using the nominal group technique method to agree on the most important domains; and (5) presentation and votes at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conference in May 2016. All phases were performed in collaboration with patient research partners.
resultsWe identified 39 unique domains through the SLR (24 domains) and international focus groups (34 domains). 50 patients and 75 physicians rated domain importance. During the March 2016 consensus meeting, 12 patients and 12 physicians agreed on 10 candidate domains. Then, 49 patients and 71 physicians rated these domains' importance. Five were important to >70% of both groups: musculoskeletal disease activity, skin disease activity, structural damage, pain and physical function. Fatigue and participation were important to >70% of patients. Patient global and systemic inflammation were important to >70% of physicians. The updated PsA core domain set endorsed by 90% of OMERACT 2016 participants includes musculoskeletal disease activity, skin disease activity, pain, patient global, physical function, health-related quality of life, fatigue and systemic inflammation.
conclusionsThe updated PsA core domain set incorporates patients' and physicians' priorities and evolving PsA research. Next steps include identifying outcome measures that adequately assess these domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.