Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613788›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Decision-to-Implement Worksheet for Evidence-based Interventions: From the WWAMI Region Practice and Research Network.

Karin Johnson, Leah Tuzzio, Anne Renz, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Michael Parchman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karin JohnsonFrom Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA (KJ, LT, AR, MP); and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (L-MB).
Leah TuzzioFrom Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA (KJ, LT, AR, MP); and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (L-MB). tuzzio.l@ghc.org.
Anne RenzFrom Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA (KJ, LT, AR, MP); and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (L-MB).
Laura-Mae BaldwinFrom Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA (KJ, LT, AR, MP); and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (L-MB).
Michael ParchmanFrom Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA (KJ, LT, AR, MP); and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (L-MB).

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth-related scientific discoveries are often not applied in clinical settings after publication, even when recommended by a trusted journal or professional association. This article describes an assessment tool we developed for use by primary care clinicians and practice administrators to evaluate whether to implement recommended evidence-based interventions in their practices.

methodsWe used dissemination and implementation theory to develop a worksheet to guide decision making about whether interventions are suitable for implementation in primary care practice settings. We tested the tool by analyzing how members of a primary care practice-based research network rated 4 evidence-based interventions.

resultsThe median likelihood of implementation ranged from 2 to 3.5 on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high). Raters' level of agreement with statements about 3 intervention characteristics was associated (P < .05) with a higher likelihood of implementation using Spearman rank-order correlation: simple to implement, testable before fully implementing, and modifiable to meet the needs of the practice. Raters found the worksheet helpful in thinking through potential implementation, especially the prompts about modifiability and relevance to the practice's patients and priorities.

conclusionsThe Decision-to-Implement Worksheet provides a new resource for primary care practices that want to assess whether evidence-based interventions are suitable to adopt or adapt to meet their needs.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Services ResearchHumansModels, OrganizationalPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareProcess Assessment, Health CareDecision MakingEvidence-Based MedicinePractice-based ResearchPrimary Health CareTranslational Medical Research

Identifiers

PMID27613788
PMCPMC5065058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.