Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613738›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2017

Prevalence and Determinants of Repeat Mammography Among Women from a Developing Country.

Ana María Salinas-Martínez, Jimena Estefanía Gaspar-Rivera, Oscar Juárez-Pérez, José Roberto Montañez-Sauceda, Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha, Francisco Javier Guzmán-de-la-Garza, Álvaro Mathiew-Quirós

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana María Salinas-MartínezEpidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Social Security Institute, Ave. Lincoln S/N esquina Ma. Jesús Candia. Col. Valle Verde, 2º sector, CP 64360, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico. amsalinasmartinez@gmail.com.
Jimena Estefanía Gaspar-RiveraSchool of Public Health, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Oscar Juárez-PérezEpidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
José Roberto Montañez-SaucedaEpidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Social Security Institute, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Georgina Mayela Núñez-RochaSchool of Public Health, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Avenida Dr. Eduardo Aguirre Pequeño y Yuriria. Col. Mitras Centro, CP 64460, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Francisco Javier Guzmán-de-la-GarzaEpidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Social Security Institute, Ave. Lincoln S/N esquina Ma. Jesús Candia. Col. Valle Verde, 2º sector, CP 64360, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Álvaro Mathiew-QuirósEpidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Social Security Institute, Ave. Lincoln S/N esquina Ma. Jesús Candia. Col. Valle Verde, 2º sector, CP 64360, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failures in repeat mammography decrease the potential benefits of screening; however, it is notable that the recent use of mammography is more frequently studied than repeat use. We estimated the prevalence and analyzed determinants for repeat mammography among women from Mexico, a developing country of Latin America. It was a two-stage study with an initial cross-sectional design (n = 1045) and a final case-control design that involved women of at least 45 years of age with no history of breast, ovarian, or uterine cancer. Case subjects were those with three or more mammograms in the last 5 years, with the last one carried out within the last two years (n = 444); control subjects included those who underwent ≥3 mammograms throughout their life with the most recent carried out >2 years ago (n = 444). Through interviews, we evaluated context-dependency, fulfillment of expected outcomes, self-efficacy, and risk perception, among other factors. We estimated the prevalence with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and odds ratios (OR) using multivariate binary logistic regression. The prevalence of repeat mammography was 40.4 % (95 % CI 37.4-43.4). Self-efficacy demonstrated the highest effect on repeat use (OR 7.7, 95 % CI 4.7-12.6), followed by awareness context-dependency (OR 4.9, 95 % CI 3.3-7.2), the use of Papanicolaou testing (OR 3.5, 95 % CI 2.3-5.2), the fulfillment of expected waiting time outcome (OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.2-4.7), and context-dependency related to self-referral/health provider referral (OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.7-3.4), independent of risk perception, age, education, and positive emotional state of mind. The study showed a need for increasing the prevalence of promoting awareness of the determining factors of repeat mammography, which is a necessary component in the early detection of breast cancer.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesEducational StatusFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMammographyMexicoMiddle AgedPrevalenceBreast cancerCancer screeningHealth behaviorMaintenanceMammography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.