ReviewInflammopharmacology2016
Nuclear histones: major virulence factors or just additional early sepsis markers? A comment.
Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histone Citrullination Mediates a Protective Role in Endothelium and Modulates Inflammation.Cells · 2022Article
- Pro-inflammatory agents released by pathogens, dying host cells, and neutrophils act synergistically to destroy host tissues: a working hypothesis.Journal of inflammation research · 2019Review
- Are histones real pathogenic agents in sepsis?Nature reviews. Immunology · 2018Article
- Serum histones as biomarkers of the severity of heatstroke in dogs.Cell stress & chaperones · 2017Article
- From amino acids polymers, antimicrobial peptides, and histones, to their possible role in the pathogenesis of septic shock: a historical perspective.Journal of inflammation research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2009, Xu et al. and Chaput et al. in Nature Medicine had argued that the main cause of death in sepsis is the release from neutrophil nets of nuclear histone, highly toxic to endothelial cells and that these polycations are major and unique virulence factors. Since 2009, numerous researchers have also suggested the involvement of histones in the pathophysiology of many clinical disorders. If histones are indeed major unique virulence toxic agents, then heparin, activated protein C and antibodies to histone should prove excellent antisepsis agents. However, this is provided that these agents are administered to patients early enough before the activation of the cytokine storms, immune responses and the coagulation cascades are irreversibly unleashed. This may not be practical, since a diagnosis of sepsis is usually made much later. Future identifications of novel early markers are therefore needed and a compilation of cocktails of antagonists may replace the faulty single antagonists tried for many years, but in vain, to prevent death in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.