Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613627›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Cross-sectional biomonitoring study of pesticide exposures in Queensland, Australia, using pooled urine samples.

A L Heffernan, K English, Lml Toms, A M Calafat, L Valentin-Blasini, P Hobson, S Broomhall, R S Ware, P Jagals, P D Sly and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Additive partially linear model for pooled biomonitoring data.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Local polynomial regression for pooled response data.Journal of nonparametric statistics · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A L HeffernanNational Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Rd, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia. amy.heffernan@uqconnect.edu.au.
K EnglishSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Lml TomsSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
A M CalafatCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
L Valentin-BlasiniCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
P HobsonSullivan Nicolaides Pathology Taringa, Taringa, QLD, Australia.
S BroomhallAustralian Government Department of the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
R S WareChildren's Health and Environment Program, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
P JagalsChildren's Health and Environment Program, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
P D SlyChildren's Health and Environment Program, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J F MuellerNational Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Rd, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A range of pesticides are available in Australia for use in agricultural and domestic settings to control pests, including organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides, herbicides, and insect repellents, such as N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET). The aim of this study was to provide a cost-effective preliminary assessment of background exposure to a range of pesticides among a convenience sample of Australian residents. De-identified urine specimens stratified by age and sex were obtained from a community-based pathology laboratory and pooled (n = 24 pools of 100 specimens). Concentrations of urinary pesticide biomarkers were quantified using solid-phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean biomarker concentrations ranged from <0.1 to 36.8 ng/mL for organophosphate insecticides, <0.1 to 5.5 ng/mL for pyrethroid insecticides, and <0.1 to 8.51 ng/mL for all other biomarkers with the exception of the DEET metabolite 3-diethylcarbamoyl benzoic acid (4.23 to 850 ng/mL). We observed no association between age and concentration for most biomarkers measured but noted a "U-shaped" trend for five organophosphate metabolites, with the highest concentrations observed in the youngest and oldest age strata, perhaps related to age-specific differences in behavior or physiology. The fact that concentrations of specific and non-specific metabolites of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos were higher than reported in USA and Canada may relate to differences in registered applications among countries. Additional biomonitoring programs of the general population and focusing on vulnerable populations would improve the exposure assessment and the monitoring of temporal exposure trends as usage patterns of pesticide products in Australia change over time.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHerbicidesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsecticidesEnvironmental PollutantsHerbicidesInsecticidesInsect RepellentsBiomonitoringChildrenOrganophosphatePesticidesPyrethroidUrine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.