ArticleBMC family practice2016
Clinician-identified problems and solutions for delayed diagnosis in primary care: a PRIORITIZE study.
Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment delay significantly increases mortality in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2025Pooled it
- [Effectiveness of a new model of telephone derivation shared between primary care and hospital care].Atencion primaria · 2019Trial
- A Bayesian network for identifying causes of breathlessness using a national electronic medical records (EMR) database.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sex Disparities in Treatment Trajectories of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are Associated With Diagnostic Delay.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2025Article
- Comparative study of lung cancer care and survival outcomes across the Nordic countries.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Broadening the definition of patient-safety events: lessons from a multicentre learning health system collaborative.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Weekend effect on in-hospital outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from a propensity-matched national analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- ALS: A Silent Slayer of Motor Neurons. Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine as an Effective Therapy.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Equipping computational pathology systems with artifact processing pipelines: a showcase for computation and performance trade-offs.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Avoidable Injuries in 1,211 Patients with Dermatological Diagnoses in Claims to the Swedish National Patient Insurance Company during 2016 to 2020.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
- Hidden systems in primary care cancer detection: an embedded qualitative intervention development study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models in Emergency Plastic Surgery Decision-Making: The Role of Physical Exam Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Diabetes mellitus and associated factors among HIV-positive patients at primary health care facilities in Harare, Zimbabwe: a descriptive cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Smart medical report: efficient detection of common and rare diseases on common blood tests.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Delay in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Systematic Investigation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Priorities for family physician and general practitioner recruitment and retention in Singapore: a PRIORITIZE study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Microneedle-based devices for point-of-care infectious disease diagnostics.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021Review
- Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2020Article
- Patient and provider perspectives on reducing risk of harm in primary health care: a qualitative questionnaire study in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2020Article
- The Use of Artificially Intelligent Self-Diagnosing Digital Platforms by the General Public: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed diagnosis in primary care is a common, harmful and costly patient safety incident. Its measurement and monitoring are underdeveloped and underutilised. We created and implemented a novel approach to identify problems leading to and solutions for delayed diagnosis in primary care.
methodsWe developed a novel priority-setting method for patient safety problems and solutions called PRIORITIZE. We invited more than 500 NW London clinicians via an open-ended questionnaire to identify three main problems and solutions relating to delayed diagnosis in primary care. 113 clinicians submitted their suggestions which were thematically grouped and synthesized into a composite list of 33 distinct problems and 27 solutions. A random group of 75 clinicians from the initial cohort scored these and an overall ranking was derived. The agreement between the clinicians' scores was presented using the Average Expert Agreement.
resultsThe top ranked problems were poor communication between secondary and primary care and the inverse care law, i.e. a mismatch between patients' medical needs and healthcare supply. The highest ranked solutions included: a more rigorous system of communicating abnormal results of investigations to patients, direct hotlines to specialists for GPs to discuss patient problems and better training of primary care clinicians in relevant areas. A priority highlighted throughout the findings is a need to improve communication between clinicians as well as with patients. The highest ranked suggestions had the highest consensus between experts.
conclusionsThe novel method we have developed is highly feasible, informative and scalable, and merits wider exploration with a view of becoming part of a routine pro-active and preventative system for patient safety assessment. Clinicians proposed a range of concrete suggestions with an emphasis on improving communication among clinicians and with patients and better GP training. In their view, delayed diagnosis can be largely prevented with interventions requiring relatively minor investment. Rankings of identified problems and solutions can serve as an aid to policy makers and commissioners of care in prioritization of scarce healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.