Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613564›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2016

Clinician-identified problems and solutions for delayed diagnosis in primary care: a PRIORITIZE study.

Lorainne Tudor Car, Nikolaos Papachristou, Adrian Bull, Azeem Majeed, Joseph Gallagher, Mona El-Khatib, Paul Aylin, Igor Rudan, Rifat Atun, Josip Car and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hidden systems in primary care cancer detection: an embedded qualitative intervention development study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lorainne Tudor CarDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.tudor.car@imperial.ac.uk.
Nikolaos PapachristouDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adrian BullImperial College Health Partners, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Joseph GallaghergHealth Research Group, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Mona El-KhatibDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul AylinDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Igor RudanCentre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
Rifat AtunDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Josip CarHealth Services and Outcomes Research Programme, LKCMedicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Charles VincentDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed diagnosis in primary care is a common, harmful and costly patient safety incident. Its measurement and monitoring are underdeveloped and underutilised. We created and implemented a novel approach to identify problems leading to and solutions for delayed diagnosis in primary care.

methodsWe developed a novel priority-setting method for patient safety problems and solutions called PRIORITIZE. We invited more than 500 NW London clinicians via an open-ended questionnaire to identify three main problems and solutions relating to delayed diagnosis in primary care. 113 clinicians submitted their suggestions which were thematically grouped and synthesized into a composite list of 33 distinct problems and 27 solutions. A random group of 75 clinicians from the initial cohort scored these and an overall ranking was derived. The agreement between the clinicians' scores was presented using the Average Expert Agreement.

resultsThe top ranked problems were poor communication between secondary and primary care and the inverse care law, i.e. a mismatch between patients' medical needs and healthcare supply. The highest ranked solutions included: a more rigorous system of communicating abnormal results of investigations to patients, direct hotlines to specialists for GPs to discuss patient problems and better training of primary care clinicians in relevant areas. A priority highlighted throughout the findings is a need to improve communication between clinicians as well as with patients. The highest ranked suggestions had the highest consensus between experts.

conclusionsThe novel method we have developed is highly feasible, informative and scalable, and merits wider exploration with a view of becoming part of a routine pro-active and preventative system for patient safety assessment. Clinicians proposed a range of concrete suggestions with an emphasis on improving communication among clinicians and with patients and better GP training. In their view, delayed diagnosis can be largely prevented with interventions requiring relatively minor investment. Rankings of identified problems and solutions can serve as an aid to policy makers and commissioners of care in prioritization of scarce healthcare resources.

Indexed as

General PracticePatient SafetyQuality ImprovementCommunication BarriersCrowdsourcingDelayed DiagnosisHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareProblem SolvingCliniciansCrowd-sourcingDelayed diagnosisPatient safetyPrimary carePrioritization

Identifiers

PMID27613564
PMCPMC5017013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.