ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
A decade of day-case endoscopically guided stent placement in malignant oesophagogastric strictures.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy and safety of palliative esophageal stenting without fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) are the palliative treatment of choice for rapid symptomatic relief in patients with malignant dysphagia. Increasingly endoscopically guided insertion is performed as a day case and without the need for fluoroscopic guidance. This consecutive case series reports 11-year experience of endoscopically guided SEMS insertion in a large UK specialist oesophagogastric unit.
methodsPatients undergoing stent insertion for malignant dysphagia between 2003 and 2014 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Data on patient demographics, tumour characteristics, indications, technique of insertion, complications, and need for re-intervention were abstracted and then corroborated by retrospective review of electronic case records.
resultsA total of 362 patients with a median age of 76 years underwent primary SEMS insertion under endoscopic guidance. Repeat endoscopic intervention was required in 26 patients within 30 days and 59 patients within 90 days of primary insertion, giving Kaplan-Meier estimated re-intervention rates of 7.7 % and 20.3 %, respectively. Higher tumours were associated with need for repeat intervention (p = 0.014). The most frequent repeat intervention was insertion of a new stent, most commonly for stent migration or tumour overgrowth. Out of 252, 222 (88.1 %) patients referred through a rapid access pathway were stented as day cases, and the 30-day readmission rate in this cohort did not differ significantly from patients stented as inpatients (p = 0.774). Three (0.8 %) patients suffered a perforation, and there was a single procedure-related death.
conclusionsThis large consecutive case series demonstrates that endoscopically guided SEMS insertion in malignant dysphagia can be performed efficiently as a day case with low complication, readmission, and re-intervention rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.