Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613438›Full record

ArticleBiological research for nursing2017

Symptom Science: Repurposing Existing Omics Data.

Nicole D Osier, Christopher C Imes, Heba Khalil, Jamie Zelazny, Ann E Johansson, Yvette P Conley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research for nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole D Osier1 School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Christopher C Imes1 School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Heba Khalil2 School of Nursing, Applied Science University, Amman, Jordan.
Jamie Zelazny1 School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann E Johansson1 School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yvette P Conley1 School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Targeting Research and Academic Training of Nurses in GenomicsT32NR009759 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CONLEY, YVETTE P · 2006 to 2025
$4.5M
Mechanism of Melatonin-induced Neuroprotection in Traumatic Brain InjuryF31NR014957 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI OSIER, NICOLE DANIELLE · 2014 to 2015
$86k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR014957NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omics approaches, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, microbiomics, and metabolomics, generate large data sets. Once they have been used to address initial study aims, these large data sets are extremely valuable to the greater research community for ancillary investigations. Repurposing available omics data sets provides data to address research questions, generate and test hypotheses, replicate findings, and conduct mega-analyses. Many well-characterized, longitudinal, epidemiological studies collected extensive phenotype data related to symptom occurrence and severity. While the main phenotype of interest for many of these studies was often not symptom related, these data were collected to better understand the primary phenotype of interest. A search for symptom data (i.e., cognitive impairment, fatigue, gastrointestinal distress/nausea, sleep, and pain) in the database of genotypes and phenotypes (dbGaP) revealed many studies that collected symptom and omics data. There is thus a real possibility for nurse scientists to be able to look at symptom data over time from thousands of individuals and use omics data to identify key biological underpinnings that account for the development and severity of symptoms without recruiting participants or generating any new data. The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to resources that provide omics data to the research community for repurposing, provide guidance on using these databases, and encourage the use of these data to move symptom science forward.

Indexed as

big dataomicsrepurposingsymptoms

Identifiers

PMID27613438
PMCPMC5942510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.