ArticleBiological research for nursing2017
Symptom Science: Repurposing Existing Omics Data.
Article in Biological research for nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel bayesian nonparametric unsupervised learning approach to precision symptom management in cancer survivors: a re-analysis of a comparative effectiveness trial.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Omics approaches, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, microbiomics, and metabolomics, generate large data sets. Once they have been used to address initial study aims, these large data sets are extremely valuable to the greater research community for ancillary investigations. Repurposing available omics data sets provides data to address research questions, generate and test hypotheses, replicate findings, and conduct mega-analyses. Many well-characterized, longitudinal, epidemiological studies collected extensive phenotype data related to symptom occurrence and severity. While the main phenotype of interest for many of these studies was often not symptom related, these data were collected to better understand the primary phenotype of interest. A search for symptom data (i.e., cognitive impairment, fatigue, gastrointestinal distress/nausea, sleep, and pain) in the database of genotypes and phenotypes (dbGaP) revealed many studies that collected symptom and omics data. There is thus a real possibility for nurse scientists to be able to look at symptom data over time from thousands of individuals and use omics data to identify key biological underpinnings that account for the development and severity of symptoms without recruiting participants or generating any new data. The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to resources that provide omics data to the research community for repurposing, provide guidance on using these databases, and encourage the use of these data to move symptom science forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.