Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613431›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2017

Mutation analysis for the detection of long QT-syndrome (LQTS) associated SNPs.

Edelmann J, Dobosz T, Sobieszczanska M, Kawecka-Negrusz M, Dreßler J, Nastainczyk-Wulf M

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edelmann JInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. jeanett.edelmann@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Dobosz TDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Sobieszczanska MDepartment of Pathophysiology, Division of Electrocardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Kawecka-Negrusz MDepartment and Clinic of Cardiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Dreßler JInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nastainczyk-Wulf MInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital long QT-syndrome (LQTS) is an inherited cardiac arrhythmia, which is characterized by a prolonged QT interval which predisposes to sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias. The altered functions are based on different mutations in LQTS-associated genes. In this study, we performed a mutation analysis for the detection of 125 LQTS-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) focused on the genes KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A by using the SNaPshot multiplex minisequencing technique. Furthermore, we investigated 152 autopsy-negative cases from younger adults and infants, as well as samples from patients with clinically suspicion for LQTS, in which we found two types of variations.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA Mutational AnalysisERG1 Potassium ChannelHeterozygoteHumansKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelLong QT SyndromeMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelERG1 Potassium ChannelKCNH2 protein, humanKCNQ1 Potassium ChannelNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelSCN5A protein, humanKCNH2KCNQ1Long QT-syndrome (LQTS)SCN5ASingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)SNaPshot techniqueSudden cardiac death (SCD)

Identifiers

PMID27613431
OpenAlexW2513536890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.