Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613387›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Does charge-free screening improve detection of gestational diabetes in women from deprived areas: a cross-sectional study.

Andreas Beyerlein, Daniela Koller, Anette-Gabriele Ziegler, Nicholas Lack, Werner Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bridging Gaps and Understanding Disparities in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus to Improve Perinatal Outcomes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas BeyerleinInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. andreas.beyerlein@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Daniela KollerDepartment of Health Services Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Anette-Gabriele ZieglerInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Nicholas LackGerman Bavarian Quality Assurance Institute for Medical Care, Munich, Germany.
Werner MaierGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Partner, Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) occurs in 2-6 % of all pregnancies. We investigated whether area level deprivation is associated with a higher risk for GDM and whether GDM detection rates in deprived regions changed after the introduction of charge-free GDM screening in Germany in 2012.

methodsWe analyzed population-based data from Bavaria, Germany, comprising n = 587,621 deliveries in obstetric units between 2008 and 2014. Area level deprivation was assessed municipality-based using the Bavarian Index of Multiple Deprivation (BIMD), divided into quintiles and assigned to each mother based on her residential address. We estimated annual odds ratios (ORs) for GDM diagnosis by BIMD quintile with adjustment for maternal obesity, maternal age, migration background and single mother status.

resultsWomen from the most deprived regions were less likely to be diagnosed with GDM before introduction of charge-free GDM screening (OR = 0.76 [95 % confidence interval: 0.66, 0.86] compared to least deprived areas), in 2008. In contrast, high area level deprivation was associated with significantly increased risk of GDM diagnosis in 2013 (OR [95 % confidence interval] = 1.15 [1.02, 1.29]). The OR was also elevated, although not significantly, in 2014 (OR [95 % confidence interval] = 1.05 [0.93, 1.18]).

conclusionsThe prevalence of GDM seems to have been underreported in women from highly deprived areas before introduction of the charge-free GDM screening in Germany. In fact, women living in deprived regions seem to have an increased risk for GDM and may profit from access to charge-free GDM screening.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGermanyHumansMass ScreeningOdds RatioPovertyPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrevalenceRisk FactorsArea level deprivationBavarian index of multiple deprivationCharge-free screeningGestational diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID27613387
PMCPMC5016952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.