SynthesisBMC health services research2016
The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Networks for healthcare delivery: a systematic literature review.Journal of health organization and management · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of new forms of large-scale general practice provider collaborations on England's NHS: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Pooled it
- The role of hospitals in bridging the care continuum: a systematic review of coordination of care and follow-up for adults with chronic conditions.BMC health services research · 2017Pooled it
- Promoting rational antibiotic prescribing for non-complicated infections: understanding social influence in primary care networks in Germany.BMC family practice · 2020Trial
- The complex phenomenon of dysrational antibiotics prescribing decisions in German primary healthcare: a qualitative interview study using dual process theory.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2020Trial
- Real-World Use of Controlled Terminologies, Ontologies, and Vocabularies for Evidence Generation Across a Large International Observational Network: Challenges and Lessons Learned From a Mixed Method Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Femoral Arterial Calcification, Atherogenic Index of Plasma, and 1-Year Mortality After Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the impact of national hospital plan on healthcare service performance in Albania: evidence from the regional Memorial Hospital in Fier.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Chronic Pain and Biopsychosocial Correlates in Rural Filipino Adults: A Cross-Sectional Secondary Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Key priorities to prevent avoidable asthma hospitalisations: insights from end-users.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- How do clinical networks operationalize safety and quality stewardship? A qualitative study of Australian clinical networks.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Understanding the initiation, formation, functioning, and performing of networks to change practices - Realist evaluation of a programme to improve newborn care in Kenya.SSM - health systems · 2025Article
- Building health system resilience in Romania: a consensus on policy priorities.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Article
- Champions as catalysts for change: a realist evaluation of their impact in primary care.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- AI Nurses Network: The Importance of Clinical Research Networks in Nursing.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025Article
- The determinants of evidence use by Australian clinical networks as agents and stewards of safety and quality: a conceptual framework.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article
- The Caring Life Course Theory: Opening new frontiers in care-A cardiac rehabilitation example.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- The role of neurology in the development of community healthcare within the Italian national health service. The position of the Italian society of neurology (SIN).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Editorial: Opportunities and challenges of interprofessional collaboration and education, volume II.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReorganisation of healthcare services into networks of clinical experts is increasing as a strategy to promote the uptake of evidence based practice and to improve patient care. This is reflected in significant financial investment in clinical networks. However, there is still some question as to whether clinical networks are effective vehicles for quality improvement. The aim of this systematic review was to ascertain the effectiveness of clinical networks and identify how successful networks improve quality of care and patient outcomes.
methodsA systematic search was undertaken in accordance with the PRISMA approach in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed for relevant papers between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2014. Established protocols were used separately to examine and assess the evidence from quantitative and qualitative primary studies and then integrate findings.
resultsA total of 22 eligible studies (9 quantitative; 13 qualitative) were included. Of the quantitative studies, seven focused on improving quality of care and two focused on improving patient outcomes. Quantitative studies were limited by a lack of rigorous experimental design. The evidence indicates that clinical networks can be effective vehicles for quality improvement in service delivery and patient outcomes across a range of clinical disciplines. However, there was variability in the networks' ability to make meaningful network- or system-wide change in more complex processes such as those requiring intensive professional education or more comprehensive redesign of care pathways. Findings from qualitative studies indicated networks that had a positive impact on quality of care and patients outcomes were those that had adequate resources, credible leadership and efficient management coupled with effective communication strategies and collaborative trusting relationships.
conclusionsThere is evidence that clinical networks can improve the delivery of healthcare though there are few high quality quantitative studies of their effectiveness. Our findings can provide policymakers with some insight into how to successfully plan and implement clinical networks by ensuring strong clinical leadership, an inclusive organisational culture, adequate resourcing and localised decision-making authority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.