Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27613303›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2016

[Predictive molecular pathological stratification of hematological neoplasms].

M Andrulis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M AndrulisInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11 (M23), 89070, Ulm, Deutschland. mindaugas.andrulis@uniklinik-ulm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comprehensive sequencing of the complete genome of various hematological neoplasms has allowed an in-depth insight into the genomic heterogeneity and led to the discovery of new genetic aberrations, which seem to be very promising as therapeutic target structures. The molecular target structures of new therapeutic agents are, however, nearly exclusively proteins and cannot be directly identified with nucleic acid-based investigation methods. There is a great potential in investigations at the protein level that reflect an expression of the target protein and/or alterations of the signal cascade in tumor cells. In this context immunohistochemistry is a procedure that can deliver the decisive information using mutation, phosphorylation and glycosylation-specific primary antibodies. This study was carried out to comprehensively investigate the diagnostic utilization of such antibodies for hematological neoplasms. The studies summarized in this article emphasize the significance of tissue-based diagnostic approaches at the protein level and are suitable for use in patient selection for targeted treatment. A particular success of these studies was to make an essential contribution to the predictive diagnostics of multiple myeloma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorChromosome AberrationsDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityHeat-Shock ProteinsHematologic NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryIndolesLeukemia, Hairy CellMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanHeat-Shock ProteinsIndolesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesVemurafenibBiomarkerHematological neoplasmsImmunohistochemistryMultiple myelomaTargeted therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.