ReviewDer Pathologe2016
[Tumorigenesis from a pathological perspective : Tumor spread and epigenetically regulated genes in bladder cancer].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article describes the tumorigenesis of bladder cancer from a pathological perspective in three dimensions: morphology, genetics and epigenetics. Field cancerization and tumor cell migration/seeding are the two main hypotheses used for explaining synchronous and metachronous tumors in the urinary tract. By detailed histological mapping of completely embedded cystectomy specimens we found a single tumor focus in nearly 2/3 of the bladders accompanied by surrounding preinvasive carcinoma in situ. We substantiated our findings by studies analyzing TP53 mutations and loss of heterozygosity in various tumor sites. Identical TP53 mutations suggested a clonal relationship of the tumor foci. In situ lineage tracing via cytochrome C oxidase and succinate dehydrogenase enzyme histochemistry and subsequent mitochondrial DNA mutation analysis for definitive evidence of a clonal relationship in bladder tumors remained inconclusive. We found indications for both theories but intraurothelial migration/seeding was more prominent.A further mechanism in tumorigenesis is gene inactivation by epigenetic DNA methylation. We analyzed DNA methylation of various genes, which had previously been found by RNA expression analysis to be downregulated in bladder cancer. Most importantly, epigenetically silenced ITIH5 was associated with early relapse in pT1 high grade tumors and functionally showed an enhanced invasive metastatic phenotype in tumor cells, suggesting a putative tumor suppressive role. Thus, epigenetic gene silencing is an additional mechanism of tumorigenesis especially in tumor progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.