Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27612978›Full record

Trial reportJournal of epidemiology and community health2017

Impact of a child stimulation intervention on early child development in rural Peru: a cluster randomised trial using a reciprocal control design.

Stella Maria Hartinger, Claudio Franco Lanata, Jan Hattendorf, Jennyfer Wolf, Ana Isabel Gil, Mariela Ortiz Obando, Magaly Noblega, Hector Verastegui, Daniel Mäusezahl

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stella Maria HartingerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Claudio Franco LanataInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Perú.
Jan HattendorfDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Jennyfer WolfDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Ana Isabel GilInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Perú.
Mariela Ortiz ObandoPrograma Nacional CUNA MAS, Lima, Perú.
Magaly NoblegaPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Perú.
Hector VerasteguiInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Perú.
Daniel MäusezahlDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Instituto de Investigación Nutricional · PESwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHPontifical Catholic University of Peru · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStimulation in early childhood can alleviate adverse effects of poverty. In a community-randomised trial, we implemented 2 home-based interventions, each serving as an attention control for the other. One group received an integrated household intervention package (IHIP), whereas the other group received an early child development (ECD) intervention. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of IHIP on diarrhoea and respiratory infections, the details of which are described elsewhere. Here, we present the impact of the ECD intervention on early childhood development indicators.

methodsIn this non-blinded community-randomised trial, an ECD intervention, adapted from the Peruvian government's National Wawa Wasi ECD programme, was implemented in 25 rural Peruvian Andean communities. We enrolled 534 children aged 6-35 months, from 50 communities randomised 1:1 into ECD and IHIP communities. In ECD communities, trained fieldworkers instructed mothers every 3 weeks over the 12 months study, to stimulate and interact with their children and to use standard programme toys. IHIP communities received an improved stove and hygiene promotion. Using a nationally validated ECD evaluation instrument, all children were assessed at baseline and 12 months later for overall performance on age-specific developmental milestones which fall into 7 developmental domains.

findingsAt baseline, ECD-group and IHIP-group children performed similarly in all domains. After 12 months, data from 258 ECD-group and 251 IHIP-group children could be analysed. The proportion of children scoring above the mean in their specific age group was significantly higher in the ECD group in all domains (range: 12-23%-points higher than IHIP group). We observed the biggest difference in fine motor skills (62% vs 39% scores above the mean, OR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.9).

conclusionsThe home-based ECD intervention effectively improved child development overall across domains and separately by investigated domain. Home-based strategies could be a promising component of poverty alleviation programmes seeking to improve developmental outcomes among rural Peruvian children. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28191222; results.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisDiarrheaFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantMalePeruPoverty AreasResearch DesignRespiratory Tract InfectionsRural Health ServicesRural PopulationCHILD HEALTHDEVELOPING COUNTRENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHLifecourse / Childhood CircumstancesRANDOMISED TRIALS

Identifiers

PMID27612978
PMCPMC5318653
OpenAlexW2516770835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.