Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27612498›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2016

The influence of glycation on a high pressure denaturation of ubiquitin.

Monika Kijewska, Karolina Radziszewska, Marta Cal, Mateusz Waliczek, Piotr Stefanowicz, Zbigniew Szewczuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Maillard Proteomics: Opening New Pages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monika KijewskaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 50-383, Poland monika.kijewska@chem.uni.wroc.pl.
Karolina RadziszewskaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 50-383, Poland.
Marta CalFaculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 50-383, Poland.
Mateusz WaliczekFaculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 50-383, Poland.
Piotr StefanowiczFaculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 50-383, Poland.
Zbigniew SzewczukFaculty of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 50-383, Poland.
University of Wrocław · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of deuterium-hydrogen exchange (DHX) and mass spectrometry (MS) can be used for studying a high pressure denaturation (HPD) of proteins. Herein we present the results of investigations of the influence of glycation on the HPD of ubiquitin. Application of various values of pressure causes different degrees of protein unfolding, resulting in molecules with a different number of protons available for exchange with deuterons. The dependence of this number on pressure gives information on the denaturation state of a protein. On the basis of the obtained results we can conclude that increasing number of fructosamine moieties in ubiquitin decreases the pressure required for its denaturation. It suggests that glycation moderately decreases the protein stability. The present study is the first example of application of hydrogen-deuterium exchange as a method of investigating the influence of posttranslational modification of protein on the HPD.

Indexed as

Protein DenaturationProtein StabilityDeuteriumDeuterium Exchange MeasurementGlycosylationHydrogenMass SpectrometryPressureProtein FoldingUbiquitinDeuteriumHydrogenUbiquitinhigh-pressure denaturationhydrogen–deuterium exchangemass spectrometrynon-enzymatic glycation

Identifiers

PMID27612498
PMCPMC5064455
OpenAlexW2508346917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.