Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27612322›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017

Molecular determination of the clonal relationships between multiple tumors in BRCA1/2-associated breast and/or ovarian cancer patients is clinically relevant.

Willemina R R Geurts-Giele, Victorien M T van Verschuer, Carolien H M van Deurzen, Paul J van Diest, Rute M S M Pedrosa, J Margriet Collée, Linetta B Koppert, Caroline Seynaeve, Winand N M Dinjens

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Willemina R R Geurts-GieleDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Victorien M T van VerschuerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carolien H M van DeurzenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rute M S M PedrosaDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Margriet ColléeDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center Family Cancer Clinic, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Linetta B KoppertDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline SeynaeveDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Winand N M DinjensDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer may develop new tumor deposits over time. It is of utmost importance to know the clonal relationships between multiple tumor localizations, enabling differentiation between multiple primaries or metastatic disease with consequences for therapy and prognosis. We evaluated the value of targeted next generation sequencing in the diagnostic workup of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with ≥2 tumor localizations and uncertain tumor origins. Forty-two female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with ≥2 tumor localizations were selected. Patients with inconclusive tumor origin after histopathological revision were 'cases'; patients with certain tumor origin of ≥3 tumors served as 'controls'. Tumors of cases and controls were analyzed by targeted next generation sequencing using a panel including CDKN2A, PTEN and TP53, hotspot mutation sites for 27 different genes and 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for detection of loss of heterozygosity. Based on prevalence of identical or different mutations and/or loss of heterozygosity patterns, tumors were classified as 'multiple primaries' or 'one entity'. Conventional histopathology yielded a conclusive result in 38/42 (90%) of patients. Four cases and 10 controls were analyzed by next generation sequencing. In 44 tumor samples, 48 mutations were found; 39 (81%) concerned TP53 mutations. In all 4 cases, the intra-patient clonal relationships between the tumor localizations could be unequivocally identified by molecular analysis. In all controls, molecular outcomes matched the conventional histopathological results. In most BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with multiple tumors routine pathology work-up is sufficient to determine tumor origins and relatedness. In case of inconclusive conventional pathology results, molecular analyses using next generation sequencing can reliably determine clonal relationships between tumors, enabling optimal treatment of individual patients.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2AdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryOvarian Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27612322
OpenAlexW2508765712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.