Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27611228›Full record

ReviewBioanalysis2016

A review of electrogenerated chemiluminescent biosensors for assays in biological matrices.

Erin M Gross, Sai Sujana Maddipati, Sarah M Snyder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bioanalysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erin M GrossDepartment of Chemistry, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Sai Sujana MaddipatiDepartment of Chemistry, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Sarah M SnyderDepartment of Chemistry, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.

Funding

UNMC Structural Biology CoreP20GM103427 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Heather Colleen Jensen-Smith · 2012 to 2026
$59.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) is the production of light via electron transfer reactions between electrochemically produced reagents. ECL-based biosensors use specific biological interactions to recognize an analyte and produce a luminescent signal. Biosensors fabricated with novel biorecognition species have increased the number of analytes detected. Some of these analytes include peptides, cells, enzymes and nucleic acids. ECL biosensors are selective, simple, sensitive and have low detection limits. Traditional methods use ruthenium complexes or luminol to generate ECL. Nanomaterials can be incorporated into ECL biosensors to improve efficiency, but also represent a new class of ECL emitters. This article reviews the application of ruthenium complex, luminol and nanomaterial-based ECL biosensors to making measurements in biological matrices over the past 4 years.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesLuminescent MeasurementsAptamers, NucleotideBiomarkers, TumorCoordination ComplexesImmunoassayLuminolNanostructuresRutheniumAptamers, NucleotideBiomarkers, TumorCoordination ComplexesLuminolRutheniumbiosensorelectrochemiluminescenceelectrochemistryelectrogenerated chemiluminescenceluminolnanomaterialsruthenium complex

Identifiers

PMID27611228
PMCPMC5041308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.