Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27610932›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Impact of latest generation cardiac interventional X-ray equipment on patient image quality and radiation dose for trans-catheter aortic valve implantations.

Amber J Gislason-Lee, Claire Keeble, Christoper J Malkin, Daniel Egleston, Josephine Bexon, Stephen M Kengyelics, Daniel Blackman, Andrew G Davies

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06944509 (RADIQAL Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06944509 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

RADIQAL Study (Radiation Dose and Image Quality Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilips Clinical & Medical Affairs GlobalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled824ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmstreatment with the Azurion system with Xres5, Azurion with Clairy IQ
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amber J Gislason-Lee1 Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Claire Keeble2 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Christoper J Malkin3 Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Daniel Egleston1 Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Josephine Bexon1 Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Stephen M Kengyelics1 Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Daniel Blackman3 Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Andrew G Davies1 Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the impact on radiation dose and image quality of a new cardiac interventional X-ray system for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients compared to the previously-used cardiac X-ray system.

methodsPatient dose and image data were retrospectively collected from a Philips AlluraClarity (new) and Siemens Axion Artis (reference) X-ray system. Patient dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy duration of 41 patient cases from each X-ray system were compared using a Wilcoxon test. Ten patient aortograms from each X-ray system were scored by 32 observers on a continuous scale to assess the clinical image quality at the given phase of the TAVI procedure. Scores were dichotomised by acceptability and analysed using a Chi-squared test.

resultsSignificant reductions in patient dose (p << 0.001) were found for the new system with no significant change in fluoroscopy duration (p = 0.052); procedure DAP reduced by 55%, fluoroscopy DAP by 48% and "cine" acquisition DAP by 61%. There was no significant difference between image quality scores of the two X-ray systems (p = 0.06).

conclusionsThe new cardiac X-ray system demonstrated a very significant reduction in patient dose with no loss of clinical image quality. Advances in Knowledge: The huge growth of TAVI may impact on the radiation exposure of cardiac patients and particularly on operators including anaesthetists; cumulative exposure of interventional cardiologists performing high volume TAVI over 30-40 years may be harmful. The Phillips Clarity upgrade including improved image enhancement and optimised X-ray settings significantly reduced radiation without reducing clinically acceptable image quality.

Indexed as

Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementFluoroscopyHumansRadiation DosageRadiography, InterventionalRadiography, ThoracicRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27610932
PMCPMC5124836
OpenAlexW2516188525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.