Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27610752›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical patent analyst2016

Surface modulatable nanocapsids for targeting and tracking toward nanotheranostic delivery.

Marie Stark, R Holland Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical patent analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie StarkDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
R Holland ChengDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
The rodent eye as a non-invasive window for understanding cancer nanotherapeuticsU01CA198880 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LAM, KIT S · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Genetically Encoded Small Illuminants for 4D nucleome imagingU01EB021230 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHENG, R.HOLLAND, IZUMIYA, YOSHIHIRO · 2015 to 2017
$990k
Present Homologous and Heterologous Antigen with Hepatitis E VirusR56AI095382 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHENG, R.HOLLAND · 2012 to 2012
$385k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198880NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI095382NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB021230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticle diagnostics and therapeutics (nanotheranostics) have significantly advanced cancer detection and treatment. However, many nanotheranostics are ineffective due to defects in tumor localization and bioavailability. An engineered Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) nanocapsid is a proposed platform for targeted cancer-cell delivery. Self-assembling from HEV capsid subunits, nanocapsids retain the capacity to enter cells and resist proteolytic/acidic conditions, but lack infectious viral elements. The nanocapsid surface was modified for chemical activation to confer tumor-specific targeting and detection, immune-response manipulation and controlled theranostic delivery. Nanotheranostic molecules can be packaged in the hollow nanocapsid shell during in vitro assembly. Complementing the adapted stability and cell-entry characteristics of the HEV capsid, a modified nanocapsid serves as a tunable tumor-targeting platform for nanotheronostic delivery.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCapsid ProteinsGenetic TherapyHepatitis E virusHumansImmunotherapyNanoparticlesNeoplasmsCapsid Proteinscancer targetingnanotheranosticsviral capsid

Identifiers

PMID27610752
PMCPMC5138959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.