ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016
MRI-based reference range for the renal pelvis anterior-posterior diameter in children ages 0-19 years.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Delayed Nephrogram: Point-of-care Quantitative Measurement, Validation as an Indicator of Obstruction, and Novel Use as a Predictor of Renal Functional Impairment.European urology focus · 2022Article
- 2021 update on the urinary tract dilation (UTD) classification system: clarifications, review of the literature, and practical suggestions.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and malignant ureteric obstruction.BJU international · 2022Article
- A simulated model for fluid and tissue heating during pediatric laser lithotripsy.Journal of pediatric urology · 2020Article
- Supine versus prone positioning for ultrasound evaluation of postnatal urinary tract dilation in children.Pediatric radiology · 2020Article
- Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.Journal of endourology · 2019Article
- Classification of pediatric urinary tract dilation: the new language.Pediatric radiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the mean and normal range of anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the renal pelves in children.
methodsPatients aged 0-19 years with normal spinal MRIs were identified after institutional review board approval. Those with dilating uropathy or abdominal surgery/radiation were excluded. The maximum APD was measured. A mixed linear model was fit to determine the relationship between APD and age, adjusted for bladder distention. The left and right kidneys were treated independently.
results283 left and 285 right renal units were included. For the left, a 3.5% increase in APD per year was predicted (p < 0.0001), with the average APD for infants and 18-year olds with non-distended bladders being 2.5 mm (95th percentile: 7.2 mm) and 4.6 mm (13.4 mm), respectively. For the right, a 3.9% increase in APD per year was predicted (p < 0.0001), with the average APD for infants and 18-year olds with non-distended bladders being 2.8 mm (8.4 mm) and 5.5 mm (16.6 mm), respectively. Compared with a non-distended bladder, a distended bladder increased the predicted APD between 23% (right) and 38% (left) (p = 0.01 and p < 0.0001, respectively).
conclusionThe mean and normal ranges of APD measured by MRI in children are provided. APD increases with age and bladder distension and is greater on the left. Advances in knowledge: This article establishes normative ranges for APD, a critical component of genitourinary tract evaluation, and does so using the most precise imaging modality for this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.