Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27610565›Full record

ReviewCell2016

In Vivo Cellular Reprogramming: The Next Generation.

Deepak Srivastava, Natalie DeWitt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 286 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Regenerative therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Combinatorial expression of glial transcription factors induces Schwann cell-specific gene expression in mouse embryonic fibroblasts.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Direct in vivo reprogramming to relieve tissue ischemia via induced vasculogenesis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Target neutrophil heterogeneity and plasticity in cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak SrivastavaGladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Roddenberry Stem Cell Center at Gladstone, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Departments of Pediatrics and Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: dsrivastava@gladstone.ucsf.edu.
Natalie DeWittGladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Gladstone Institutes · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Transcriptional Networks During Cardiac DifferentiationP01HL089707 · NHLBI · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI SRIVASTAVA, DEEPAK · 2008 to 2017
$20.4M
CARDIOGENESIS--MOLECULAR MECHANISMSR01HL057181 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI DEEPAK SRIVASTAVA · 1997 to 2026
$14.0M
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Understanding and Treatment of Heart DiseasU01HL100406 · NHLBI · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI BRUNEAU, BENOIT GAETAN, CONKLIN, BRUCE R · 2009 to 2015
$9.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL089707NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL057181NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular reprogramming technology has created new opportunities in understanding human disease, drug discovery, and regenerative medicine. While a combinatorial code was initially found to reprogram somatic cells to pluripotency, a "second generation" of cellular reprogramming involves lineage-restricted transcription factors and microRNAs that directly reprogram one somatic cell to another. This technology was enabled by gene networks active during development, which induce global shifts in the epigenetic landscape driving cell fate decisions. A major utility of direct reprogramming is the potential of harnessing resident support cells within damaged organs to regenerate lost tissue by converting them into the desired cell type in situ. Here, we review the progress in direct cellular reprogramming, with a focus on the paradigm of in vivo reprogramming for regenerative medicine, while pointing to hurdles that must be overcome to translate this technology into future therapeutics.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInsulin-Secreting CellsMyocytes, CardiacNeuronsRegenerative MedicineResearchTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID27610565
PMCPMC6234007
OpenAlexW2510157877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.