Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27610362›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2016

Effect of Preventive Chlamydia abortus Vaccination in Offspring Development in Sheep Challenged Experimentally.

Teresa García-Seco, Marta Pérez-Sancho, Jesús Salinas, Alejandro Navarro, Alberto Díez-Guerrier, Nerea García, Pilar Pozo, Joaquín Goyache, Lucas Domínguez, Julio Álvarez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chlamydiosis in Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  2. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors Associated withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Efficacy of TwoVaccines · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Teresa García-SecoCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid , Madrid , Spain.
Marta Pérez-SanchoCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Campus de Excelencia Internacional (CEI) Moncloa, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Jesús SalinasDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', Universidad de Murcia , Murcia , Spain.
Alejandro NavarroCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid , Madrid , Spain.
Alberto Díez-GuerrierMAEVA SERVET S.L., Alameda del Valle , Madrid , Spain.
Nerea GarcíaCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid , Madrid , Spain.
Pilar PozoCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid , Madrid , Spain.
Joaquín GoyacheCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lucas DomínguezCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Julio ÁlvarezDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota , Saint Paul, MN , USA.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversity of Minnesota · USVodafone (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovine enzootic abortion, caused by Chlamydia abortus, leads to important economic losses worldwide. In addition to reproductive failures, infection may impact lamb growth during the first weeks after birth, yet this effect has not been well characterized. Vaccination can help to control the disease but variable efficacy values have been described, possibly related with factors associated with the host, the vaccine, the parameter used for efficacy determination, and the challenge conditions. In this context, we evaluated the efficacy of an inactivated standard commercial vaccine and a 1/2 diluted dose in pregnant sheep challenged with C. abortus by examining multiple indicators of vaccine effect (including incidence of reproductive failures, bacterial excretion, and evolution of weight gain of viable lambs during the first month of life). Three groups of ewes [control non-vaccinated, C (n = 18); vaccinated with standard dose, SV (n = 16); and vaccinated with 1/2 dose, DV (n = 17)], were challenged approximately 90 days post-mating and tested using direct PCR (tissue samples and vaginal swabs) and ELISA (serum) until 31 days post-reproductive outcome. There were not significant differences in the proportions of reproductive failures or bacterial shedding after birth/abortion regardless the vaccination protocol. However, a beneficial effect of vaccination on offspring growth was detected in both vaccinated groups compared with the controls, with a mean increase in weight measured at 30 days of life of 1.5 and 2.5 kg (p = 0.056) and an increase in the geometric mean of the daily gain of 8.4 and 9.7% in lambs born from DV and SV ewes compared with controls, respectively. Our results demonstrate the effect of an inactivated vaccine in the development of the offspring of C. abortus-infected ewes at a standard and a diluted dose, an interesting finding given the difficulty in achieving sufficient antigen concentration in the production of enzootic abortion of ewes-commercial vaccines.

Indexed as

challengeChlamydia abortusenzootic abortionoffspring developmentsheepvaccination

Identifiers

PMID27610362
PMCPMC4997790
OpenAlexW2517150973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.