Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27610343›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2016

Drug delivery interfaces: A way to optimize inhalation therapy in spontaneously breathing children.

Arzu Ari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05779826 (The Effect of Playing Dough on Children's Adaptation to Nebulizer Treatment Children 3-6 Years Old Child Service), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05779826 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Playing Dough on Children's Adaptation to Nebulizer Treatment Children 3-6 Years Old Child Service: Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaltepe UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsNursing Caries, Nebulizer TherapyArmsPlay dough
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arzu AriArzu Ari, Department of Respiratory Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303-3083, United States.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several different types of drug delivery interfaces available on the market. Using the right interface for aerosol drug delivery to children is essential for effective inhalation therapy. However, clinicians usually focus on selecting the right drug-device combination and often overlook the importance of interface selection that lead to suboptimal drug delivery and therapeutic response in neonates and pediatrics. Therefore, it is necessary to critically assess each interface and understand its advantage and disadvantages in aerosol drug delivery to this patient population. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical assessment of drug delivery interfaces used for the treatment of children with pulmonary diseases by emphasizing advantages and problems associated with their use during inhalation therapy.

Indexed as

AerosolsBlow-byChildrenHigh flow nasal cannulaHoodInhalation therapyMasksMouthpieceSpacer/valved holding chamber

Identifiers

PMID27610343
PMCPMC4978620
OpenAlexW2516123294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.