Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27610230›Full record

ReviewFood and energy security2015

GplusE: beyond genomic selection.

Ian Mackay, Eric Ober, John Hickey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food and energy security, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GplusE: beyond genomic selection.Food and energy security · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian MackayJohn Bingham Laboratory NIAB Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0LE UK.
Eric OberJohn Bingham Laboratory NIAB Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0LE UK.
John HickeyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies University of Edinburgh Easter Bush Research Centre Midlothian EH25 9RG UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211553Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GplusE is a strategy for genomic selection in which the accuracy of assessment in the reference population for a primary trait such as yield is increased by the incorporation of data from high- throughput field phenotyping platforms. This increase in precision comes from both exploiting genetic relationships between traits and reducing the effect of environmental influences upon them. We describe a collaborative project among researchers and breeders to develop a large reference population of elite UK wheat lines. This will be used to test the method, to study the design of the reference population, and to test genotyping strategies and imputation methods. Finally, it will provide data to pump-prime the application of genomic selection to UK winter wheat breeding.

Indexed as

Genomic selectionhigh throughput phenotypingphenomicsselection indexwheatwheat

Identifiers

PMID27610230
PMCPMC4998132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.