Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27609653›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2017

Novel baseline predictors of adverse events during oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy.

Yamini V Virkud, A Wesley Burks, Pamela H Steele, Lloyd J Edwards, Jelena P Berglund, Stacie M Jones, Amy M Scurlock, Tamara T Perry, Robert D Pesek, Brian P Vickery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Dosing Reactions and Missed Doses Affect Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Outcomes.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Development of a tool predicting severity of allergic reaction during peanut challenge.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2018
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Real-world experience: a retrospective pediatric chart review to determine why patients and caregivers discontinue oral immunotherapy.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yamini V VirkudDepartment of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
A Wesley BurksDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Pamela H SteeleDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Lloyd J EdwardsDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jelena P BerglundDuke Translational Medicine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Stacie M JonesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark.
Amy M ScurlockDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark.
Tamara T PerryDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark.
Robert D PesekDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark.
Brian P VickeryDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: bvickery@email.unc.edu.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
Understanding the Mechanism of Mucosal ImmunotherapyR01AI068074 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BURKS, A. WESLEY · 2007 to 2016
$3.8M
The Duke Multidisciplinary Training Program in Pediatric Lung DiseaseT32HL098099 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCMAHON, TIMOTHY J · 2010 to 2014
$660k
Optimizing Tolerance Induction in Peanut Allergy: The DEVIL StudyK23AI099083 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VICKERY, BRIAN · 2012 to 2015
$494k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098099NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI099083NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising investigational therapy, its potential is limited by substantial adverse events (AEs), which are relatively understudied.

objectiveA retrospective analysis was conducted, pooling data from 3 pediatric peanut OIT trials, comprising the largest analysis of peanut OIT safety to date.

methodsWe pooled data from 104 children with peanut allergy from 3 peanut OIT studies. We catalogued AEs from parental reports, daily symptom diaries, and dose escalations. We included events that were considered likely related to OIT and identified potential baseline predictors of higher AE rates using generalized linear regression models.

resultsEighty percent of subjects experienced likely related AEs during OIT (72% during buildup and 47% during maintenance). Of these AEs, over 90% occurred while at home. Approximately 42% of subjects experienced systemic reactions, and 49% experienced gastrointestinal symptoms. Twenty percent of subjects dropped out, with half (10% of the overall group) due to persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. Baseline allergic rhinitis (AR) and peanut SPT wheal size were significant predictors of higher overall AE rates. SPT wheal size predicted increased gastrointestinal AEs, and AR predicted increased systemic reactions. Over the course of OIT, 61% of subjects received treatment for likely related AEs, 59% with antihistamines and 12% with epinephrine.

conclusionsPeanut OIT is associated with frequent AEs, with rates declining over time, and most graded mild. However, systemic reactions and intolerable gastrointestinal AEs do occur and are significantly associated with AR and peanut SPT wheal size, respectively. Further study is needed of predictive biomarkers and the overall risks and benefits of OIT.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDesensitization, ImmunologicEpinephrineFemaleHistamine AntagonistsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePeanut HypersensitivityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRhinitis, AllergicEpinephrineHistamine Antagonistsadverse eventsoral immunotherapyPeanut allergysafety

Identifiers

PMID27609653
PMCPMC5337444
OpenAlexW2514776631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.