Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27609607›Full record

SynthesisPalliative medicine2017

The under reporting of recruitment strategies in research with children with life-threatening illnesses: A systematic review.

Briony F Hudson, Linda Jm Oostendorp, Bridget Candy, Victoria Vickerstaff, Louise Jones, Monica Lakhanpaul, Myra Bluebond-Langner, Paddy Stone

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Parents' Wishes for What They Had or Had Not Done and Their Coping After Their Infant's or Child's Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Pediatric Intensive Care Unit/Emergency Department Death.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Briony F Hudson1 Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Linda Jm Oostendorp1 Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Bridget Candy2 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Victoria Vickerstaff2 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Louise Jones2 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Monica Lakhanpaul3 Population, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Myra Bluebond-Langner1 Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Paddy Stone2 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthMarie Curie MCCC-FCH-18-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers report difficulties in conducting research with children and young people with life-limiting conditions or life-threatening illnesses and their families. Recruitment is challenged by barriers including ethical, logistical and clinical considerations.

aimTo explore how children and young people (aged 0-25 years) with life-limiting conditions or life-threatening illnesses and their families were identified, invited and consented to research published in the last 5 years.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Sciences Citation Index and SCOPUS were searched for original English language research published between 2009 and 2014, recruiting children and young people with life-limiting conditions or life-threatening illness and their families.

resultsA total of 215 studies - 152 qualitative, 54 quantitative and 9 mixed methods - were included. Limited recruitment information but a range of strategies and difficulties were provided. The proportion of eligible participants from those screened could not be calculated in 80% of studies. Recruitment rates could not be calculated in 77%. A total of 31% of studies recruited less than 50% of eligible participants. Reasons given for non-invitation included missing clinical or contact data, or clinician judgements of participant unsuitability. Reasons for non-participation included lack of interest and participants' perceptions of potential burdens.

conclusionAll stages of recruitment were under reported. Transparency in reporting of participant identification, invitation and consent is needed to enable researchers to understand research implications, bias risk and to whom results apply. Research is needed to explore why consenting participants decide to take part or not and their experiences of research recruitment.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdolescentAdultBiomedical ResearchChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePalliative CareQualitative ResearchResearch DesignYoung AdultChildpalliative carepatient selectionresearch designresearch reportreview

Identifiers

PMID27609607
PMCPMC5405809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.