ArticlePublic health nutrition2017
Development of a brief, reliable and valid diet assessment tool for impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes: the UK Diabetes and Diet Questionnaire.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06722274 (Nutritional Habits Among People With and Without Diabetes in Upper Egypt), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nutritional Habits Among People With and Without Diabetes in Upper Egypt
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional Status Measurement Instruments for Diabetes: A Systematic Psychometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- A feasibility randomised controlled trial of water-only fasting prior to CAPOX chemotherapy for stage 2/3 colorectal cancer.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Impact of and Comparative Outcomes for Digital and In-Person Interventions for Complex Obesity in a Diverse Urban Population.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of a culturally tailored medical nutrition therapy to improve dietary adherence in type 2 diabetes in Benin: an ORBIT model-based protocol.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- A Technology-Enhanced Medical Nutrition Therapy and Diabetes Self-Management Education for Adults With Disability and Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Article
- Lifestyle habits and type 2 diabetes traits in patients from healthcare centers in Dubai, United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- The effects of a digital health intervention on patient activation in chronic kidney disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Correlational analysis between salivary and blood glucose levels in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Dietary Knowledge and Eating Habits among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Lebanon.Global health, epidemiology and genomics · 2024Article
- A community health worker led approach to cardiovascular disease prevention in the UK-SPICES-Sussex (scaling-up packages of interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in selected sites in Europe and Sub-saharan Africa): an implementation research project.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- The Healthy Hearts Project: Development and evaluation of a website for cardiovascular risk assessment and visualisation and self-management through healthy lifestyle goal-setting.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Protocol for a multi-site randomised controlled feasibility study investigating intermittently scanned blood continuous glucose monitoring use for gestational diabetes: the RECOGNISE study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- An updated validation of the Dietary Quality Score: associations with risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases in a Danish population.European journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Intraocular Microbiome in Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy: A Pilot Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDietary advice is fundamental in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Advice is improved by individual assessment but existing methods are time-consuming and require expertise. We developed a twenty-five-item questionnaire, the UK Diabetes and Diet Questionnaire (UKDDQ), for quick assessment of an individual's diet. The present study examined the UKDDQ's repeatability and relative validity compared with 4 d food diaries.
designThe UKDDQ was completed twice with a median 3 d gap (interquartile range=1-7 d) between tests. A 4 d food diary was completed after the second UKDDQ. Diaries were analysed and food groups were mapped on to the UKDDQ. Absolute agreement between total scores was examined using intra-class correlation (ICC). Agreement for individual items was tested with Cohen's weighted kappa (κ w).
settingSouth West of England. SUBJECTS: Adults (n 177, 50·3 % women) with, or at high risk for, T2DM; mean age 55·8 (sd 8·6) years, mean BMI 34·4 (sd 7·3) kg/m2; participants were 91 % White British.
resultsThe UKDDQ showed excellent repeatability (ICC=0·90 (0·82, 0·94)). For individual items, κ w ranged from 0·43 ('savoury pastries') to 0·87 ('vegetables'). Total scores from the UKDDQ and food diaries compared well (ICC=0·54 (0·27, 0·70)). Agreement for individual items varied and was good for 'alcohol' (κ w=0·71) and 'breakfast cereals' (κ w=0·70), with no agreement for 'vegetables' (κ w=0·08) or 'savoury pastries' (κ w=0·09).
conclusionsThe UKDDQ is a new British dietary questionnaire with excellent repeatability. Comparisons with food diaries found agreements similar to those for international dietary questionnaires currently in use. It targets foods and habits important in diabetes prevention and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.