Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27609060›Full record

ArticleChild neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence2017

[Formula: see text]Selecting measures for the neurodevelopmental assessment of children in low- and middle-income countries.

Margaret Semrud-Clikeman, Regilda Anne A Romero, Elizabeth L Prado, Elsa G Shapiro, Paul Bangirana, Chandy C John

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychometric Properties of an Arabic Modified Childhood Autism Rating Scale 2 Standard Form.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Early gross motor development: Agreement between the AIMS and the BSID-III.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaret Semrud-ClikemanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Regilda Anne A RomeroLicensed Psychologist, Keystone Behavioral Pediatrics.
Elizabeth L PradoDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis.
Elsa G ShapiroDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Paul BangiranaDepartment of Psychiatry, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Chandy C JohnDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Funding

Severe Malaria And Risk to The Brain (SMART Brain)R01NS055349 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Chandy C. John, Ruth Namazzi · 2008 to 2026
$11.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diseases affecting millions of children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as malnutrition, micronutrient deficiency, malaria, and HIV, can lead to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Thus, a key health outcome in children is neurodevelopmental status. In this paper, the neurodevelopmental screening and testing measures most commonly utilized in LMICs are reviewed, and a matrix is presented to help researchers and clinicians determine which measures may be most useful for various LMIC inquiries. The matrix is based on an Internet literature review of 114 publications for the period January 1998 to February 2016, reporting the psychometric properties of instruments tested in LMIC children. The measures are classified as screening tests or more detailed tests that include both comprehensive batteries of general development and tests of specific domains. For completeness, two experts have reviewed this paper, as well as the authors. An overview of the tests used to date is presented, including the benefits and drawbacks of each test, in order to provide researchers and developmental clinicians with a way to decide which tests may be best suited to their developmental assessment goals. Remarkable progress has been made in neurodevelopmental testing in children in LMICs over the past two decades but there remains a need for additional research in this area to develop new tests, better evaluate and adapt current tests, and assess test validity and reliability across cultures.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDeveloping CountriesChildChild, PreschoolHumansNervous SystemNeuropsychological TestsPovertyPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsLMICNeurodevelopmental testingReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID27609060
PMCPMC5690490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.