Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27609040›Full record

ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2016

Functional in vitro tension measurements of fascial tissue - a novel modified superfusion approach.

R Schleip, W Klingler, S Wearing, I Naylor, M Zuegel, K Hoppe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R SchleipDivision of Neurophysiology Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
W Klingler
S Wearing
I Naylor
M Zuegel
K Hoppe
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile two laboratory techniques are commonly used to assess the tensile properties of muscle tissue, emerging evidence suggests that the fascial components of these tissues also serve an active role in force generation. Hence, we investigated whether these techniques are sensitive for assessment of fascial micromechanics.

methodsForce measurements on dissected fascial tissue were performed either using the classical immersion organ bath or using an improved superfusion approach simulating pulsed pharmacological triggers. Rat deep dorsal fascial strips as well as rat testicular capsule were pharmacologically challenged either with mepyramine or oxytocin.

resultsThe classical immersion technique yielded a lower force response to mepyramine than the superfusion method (median: 367.4 vs. 555.4µN/mm(2)). Pause in irrigation before application reduced irregularities during bolus application. The superfusion approach was improved further by the following points: The high sensitivity of the superfusion method to bolus addition was voided by deviation of fluid supply during bolus addition.

conclusionAlthough both methods demonstrated pharmacologically induced contractile responses in lumbar fascia samples, the modified superfusion method may improve force registrations of slow contracting fascial tissue and minimize artefacts of fluid application.

Indexed as

AnimalsFasciaMiceMice, Inbred BALB COrgan Culture TechniquesRatsRats, WistarTensile Strength

Identifiers

PMID27609040
PMCPMC5114348
OpenAlexW2519634537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.