Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27608917›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2016

Information and organization in public health institutes: an ontology-based modeling of the entities in the reception-analysis-report phases.

Giandomenico Pozza, Stefano Borgo, Alessandro Oltramari, Laura Contalbrigo, Stefano Marangon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giandomenico PozzaIstituto Zooprifilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Universitá, Legnaro (PD), 10, 35020, Italy. gpozza@izsvenezie.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6282-4994
Stefano BorgoLaboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC CNR, Via alla Cascata 56/C - Povo, Trento, 38100, Italy.
Alessandro OltramariBosch Research and Technology Center, 2555 Smallman Street, Pittsburgh, 15222, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laura ContalbrigoIstituto Zooprifilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Universitá, Legnaro (PD), 10, 35020, Italy.
Stefano MarangonIstituto Zooprifilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Universitá, Legnaro (PD), 10, 35020, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITIstituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" · ITRobert Bosch (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOntologies are widely used both in the life sciences and in the management of public and private companies. Typically, the different offices in an organization develop their own models and related ontologies to capture specific tasks and goals. Although there might be an overall coordination, the use of distinct ontologies can jeopardize the integration of data across the organization since data sharing and reusability are sensitive to modeling choices.

resultsThe paper provides a study of the entities that are typically found at the reception, analysis and report phases in public institutes in the life science domain. Ontological considerations and techniques are introduced and their implementation exemplified by studying the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), a public veterinarian institute with different geographical locations and several laboratories. Different modeling issues are discussed like the identification and characterization of the main entities in these phases; the classification of the (types of) data; the clarification of the contexts and the roles of the involved entities. The study is based on a foundational ontology and shows how it can be extended to a comprehensive and coherent framework comprising the different institute's roles, processes and data. In particular, it shows how to use notions lying at the borderline between ontology and applications, like that of knowledge object. The paper aims to help the modeler to understand the core viewpoint of the organization and to improve data transparency.

conclusionsThe study shows that the entities at play can be analyzed within a single ontological perspective allowing us to isolate a single ontological framework for the whole organization. This facilitates the development of coherent representations of the entities and related data, and fosters the use of integrated software for data management and reasoning across the company.

Indexed as

Public HealthVocabulary, ControlledDatabases, FactualSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceData integrationData transparencyDOLCEKnowledge objectsOntology

Identifiers

PMID27608917
PMCPMC5017037
OpenAlexW2510652764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.