ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2016
Improving diabetic foot screening at a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation strategies for evidence-based management of type 2 diabetes at primary healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries and related barriers and facilitators: a scoping review.Implementation science communications · 2026Pooled it
- Design and evaluation of an implementation strategy of a diabetic foot program in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (iMplanta study).BMC primary care · 2026Article
- A mixed-method study on the screening practices and barriers to diabetic microvascular complications by general practitioners in community health centers of Xiamen, China.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Healthcare workers' perspectives on diabetic foot complications among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Fiji.PloS one · 2024Article
- Comparison of Endocrinologists' Physical Examination Documentation for In-person vs Video Telehealth Diabetes Visits.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2023Article
- Coverage of diabetes complications screening in rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: A cross-sectional survey.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2022Article
- Strategies to Improve Annual Diabetic Foot Screening Compliance at a Family Clinic.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020Article
- Interventions targeting hypertension and diabetes mellitus at community and primary healthcare level in low- and middle-income countries:a scoping review.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Work ability and productivity in patients with diabetic foot.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoot screening is an important part of diabetic care as it prevents significant morbidity, loss of function and mortality from diabetic foot complications. However, foot screening is often neglected.
aimThis project was aimed at educating health care workers (HCWs) in a primary health care clinic to increase diabetic foot screening practices.
settingA primary health care clinic in the Western Cape province of South AfricaMethods: A quality improvement project was conducted. HCWs' needs were assessed using a questionnaire. This was followed by focus group discussions with the HCWs, which were recorded, transcribed and assessed using a general inductive approach. An intervention was designed based on common themes. Staff members were trained on foot screening and patient information pamphlets and screening tools were made available to all clinic staff. Thirty-two consecutive diabetic patient folders were audited to compare screening in 2013 with that in 2014 after initiation of the quality improvement cycle.
resultsHCWs' confidence in conducting foot screening using the diabetic foot assessment questionnaire improved markedly after training. Diabetic foot screening practices increased from 9% in 2013 to 69% in 2014 after the first quality improvement cycle. A strengths, opportunities, aspirations and results (SOAR) analysis showed promise for continuing quality improvement cycles.
conclusionThe findings showed a significant improvement in the number of diabetic patients screened. Using strategic planning with appreciative intent based on SOAR, proved to be motivational and can be used in the planning of the next cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.