Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27608673›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2016

Improving diabetic foot screening at a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project.

Michelle L Allen, Albertine M B Van der Does, Colette Gunst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coverage of diabetes complications screening in rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: A cross-sectional survey.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2022
    Article
  7. Strategies to Improve Annual Diabetic Foot Screening Compliance at a Family Clinic.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle L Allen
Albertine M B Van der DoesDivision of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University and Swartland Hospital, Malmesbury. albertinedoes@gmail.com.
Colette Gunst

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoot screening is an important part of diabetic care as it prevents significant morbidity, loss of function and mortality from diabetic foot complications. However, foot screening is often neglected.

aimThis project was aimed at educating health care workers (HCWs) in a primary health care clinic to increase diabetic foot screening practices.

settingA primary health care clinic in the Western Cape province of South AfricaMethods: A quality improvement project was conducted. HCWs' needs were assessed using a questionnaire. This was followed by focus group discussions with the HCWs, which were recorded, transcribed and assessed using a general inductive approach. An intervention was designed based on common themes. Staff members were trained on foot screening and patient information pamphlets and screening tools were made available to all clinic staff. Thirty-two consecutive diabetic patient folders were audited to compare screening in 2013 with that in 2014 after initiation of the quality improvement cycle.

resultsHCWs' confidence in conducting foot screening using the diabetic foot assessment questionnaire improved markedly after training. Diabetic foot screening practices increased from 9% in 2013 to 69% in 2014 after the first quality improvement cycle. A strengths, opportunities, aspirations and results (SOAR) analysis showed promise for continuing quality improvement cycles.

conclusionThe findings showed a significant improvement in the number of diabetic patients screened. Using strategic planning with appreciative intent based on SOAR, proved to be motivational and can be used in the planning of the next cycle.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementDiabetic FootFocus GroupsHumansMass ScreeningNeeds AssessmentPrimary Health CareSouth AfricaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27608673
PMCPMC5062026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.