Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27608454›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2017

Gradient-Based Optimization for Poroelastic and Viscoelastic MR Elastography.

Likun Tan, Matthew D J McGarry, Elijah E W Van Houten, Ming Ji, Ligin Solamen, John B Weaver, Keith D Paulsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interface focus · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nonlinear Inversion MR Elastography With Low-Frequency Actuation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Likun Tan
Matthew D J McGarry
Elijah E W Van Houten
Ming Ji
Ligin Solamen
John B Weaver
Keith D Paulsen

Funding

Spectrally optimized, Spatially resolved Poro and Viscoelastic Brain MRER01EB018230 · NIBIB · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI PAULSEN, KEITH D. · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
CRCNS-US-German research collaboration on functional neuro-poroelastographyR01AA023684 · NIAAA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI PAULSEN, KEITH D. · 2014 to 2016
$334k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023684NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe an efficient gradient computation for solving inverse problems arising in magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). The algorithm can be considered as a generalized 'adjoint method' based on a Lagrangian formulation. One requirement for the classic adjoint method is assurance of the self-adjoint property of the stiffness matrix in the elasticity problem. In this paper, we show this property is no longer a necessary condition in our algorithm, but the computational performance can be as efficient as the classic method, which involves only two forward solutions and is independent of the number of parameters to be estimated. The algorithm is developed and implemented in material property reconstructions using poroelastic and viscoelastic modeling. Various gradient- and Hessian-based optimization techniques have been tested on simulation, phantom and in vivo brain data. The numerical results show the feasibility and the efficiency of the proposed scheme for gradient calculation.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesAlgorithmsBrainElasticityPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID27608454
PMCPMC5256858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.