Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27607602›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2016

A pressure ulcer and fall rate quality composite index for acute care units: A measure development study.

Diane K Boyle, Ananda Jayawardhana, Mary E Burman, Nancy E Dunton, Vincent S Staggs, Sandra Bergquist-Beringer, Byron J Gajewski

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Differences in the Incidence of Adverse Events in Acute Care Hospitals: Results of a Multicentre Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diane K BoyleFay W. Whitney School of Nursing, University of Wyoming, Dept. 3065, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071-2000, USA. Electronic address: dboyle@uwyo.edu.
Ananda JayawardhanaDepartment of Mathematics, Pittsburg State University, 1701 S. Broadway, Pittsburg, KS, 66762, USA. Electronic address: ajayawardhana@pittstate.edu.
Mary E BurmanFay W. Whitney School of Nursing, University of Wyoming, Dept. 3065, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071-2000, USA. Electronic address: mburman@uwyo.edu.
Nancy E DuntonSchool of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 4043, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Electronic address: ndunton@kumc.edu.
Vincent S StaggsChildren's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, 2401 Gillham Rd., Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA; School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2411 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA. Electronic address: vstaggs@cmh.edu.
Sandra Bergquist-BeringerSchool of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 4043, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Electronic address: sbergquist-beringer@kumc.edu.
Byron J GajewskiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, MS 1026, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. Electronic address: bgajewski@kumc.edu.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Wyoming · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USPittsburg State University · US

Funding

Wyoming INBRE Phase 4- Equipment Supplement for x-ray diffractometer for Center for Advanced Scientific InstrumentationP20GM103432 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI Robert Scott Seville · 2012 to 2026
$56.8M
Wyoming IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research ExcellenceP20RR016474 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI LIBERLES, DAVID A. · 2001 to 2011
$28.2M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016474NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComposite indices are single measures that combine the strengths of two or more individual measures and provide broader, easy-to-use measures for evaluation of provider performance and comparisons across units and hospitals to support quality improvement.

objectiveThe study objective was to develop a unit-level inpatient composite nursing care quality performance index-the Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index.

designTwo-phase measure development study. SETTINGS: 5144 patient care units in 857 United States hospitals participating in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indictors

methodsThe Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index was developed in two phases. In Phase 1 the formula was generated using a utility function and generalized penalty analysis. Experts with experience in healthcare quality measurement provided the point of indicator equivalence. In Phase 2 initial validity evidence was gathered based on hypothesized relationships between the Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index and other variables using two-level (unit, hospital) hierarchical linear mixed modeling.

resultsThe Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index=100-PUR-FR, where PUR is pressure ulcer rate and FR is total fall rate. Higher scores indicate better quality. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated agreement between pairs of experts and provided evidence for inter-rater reliability of the formula. The validation process demonstrated that higher registered nurse skill mix, higher percent of registered nurses with a baccalaureate in nursing or higher degree, higher percent of registered nurses with national specialty certification, and lower percent of hours supplied by agency staff were significantly associated with higher Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index scores. Higher percentages of unit patients at risk for a hospital-acquired pressure ulcer and higher unit rates of physical restraint use were not associated with higher Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index scores.

conclusionsThe Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index is a step toward providing a more holistic perspective of unit level nursing quality than individual measures and may help nurses nursing administrators obtain a broader view of which patient care units are the higher and lower performers. Further study is needed to examine the usability of the Pressure Ulcer and Fall Rate Quality Composite Index.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsPressure UlcerHumansQuality Indicators, Health CareComposite indicatorFallsPressure ulcersQuality improvementQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID27607602
PMCPMC5154684
OpenAlexW2508526337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.